Jefferson Review

"Your Liberty is Our Interest"

November 19, 2007

Home Archives / Links / Quotes / Book Reviews / Advertise /Contact us / Subscribe / Calendar

 

 

 

 

 

 The Social Security Nightmare By: Michael A. Minton

 


In 1950, there were 16 workers to support every one person that drew a Social Security check. Currently, there are 3.3 workers supporting every one person drawing Social Security. And by the time our youngest workers reach retirement age, that ratio will have dropped to 2:1. It is a dismal looking picture at best.

Several things need to happen in order to salvage Social Security. One of the most obvious is that we need to abandon the idea of a Totalization Agreement with Mexico. Such an agreement with Mexico is totally one-sided, and would immediately bankrupt our Social Security system, as it would instantly qualify millions of Mexicans, both legal and illegal, for benefits.

I wrote an article on this subject back in 2005. It can be viewed here: http://mensnewsdaily.com/blog/minton/2005/04/totalization-with-mexico-could-total.html. For the life of me, I cannot figure out why this subject has not gotten any more attention than it has. I mean, in 2005 we had President Bush going around the country trying to convince us that Social Security was in dire financial straits (which it was and IS). But at the same time the President was telling us how bad off Social Security was, the administration was brokering a deal with Mexico that would annihilate the system…unfathomable!

Quoting a paragraph from my previous article, “The Social Security Administration would have us believe that illegal workers would not qualify under a Totalization Agreement with Mexico. However, according to azcentral.com, an Inspector General's report says that the SSA ‘doesn't consider the work-authorization status of the individual when they earned the wages. It only considers whether the individual can prove he or she paid Federal Insurance Contribution Act (FICA) taxes as part of this work.’ And, even IF the claim that illegal workers were not eligible were true, the writing on the wall is that a general amnesty is on the horizon, which would immediately make ALL illegals (and their dependants) eligible.”

Further complicating this issue is the fact that once a beneficiary of this treaty returns to Mexico, his/her spouse and dependants also become eligible for U.S. Social Security benefits. Can you imagine the cost to the S.S. system? According to the Center for Immigration Studies, (http://www.cis.org), in 2000, there were an estimated 9,177,000 Mexicans in the United States (4,808,000 are here illegally).

All that needs to happen for this Totalization Agreement with Mexico to go into effect is for a sitting president to sign it…that’s it. It DOES NOT need to be passed by Congress. However, there is hope! If, within 60 days of the president’s signature, Congress repeals the treaty, it is then nullified. This is where you, the American public, DESPARATELY need to get involved. That’s why I urge you to read the article “Totalization With Mexico Could Total Social Security.” Again, you can view it at: http://mensnewsdaily.com/blog/minton/2005/04/totalization-with-mexico-could-total.html. There you will learn what you can do to stop the madness.

I have been digging and digging to find out where our current field of contenders for president stand on the issue of totalization with Mexico. According to an amendment in the Senate “To prohibit the use of funds to administer Social Security benefit payments under a totalization agreement with Mexico,” it would appear that most of our Democrat, and at least one of our Republican runners lacks the conviction to even vote. Those abstaining were: Sen. Biden (D-DE), Sen. Clinton (D-NY), Sen. Dodd (D-CT), Sen. Kennedy (D-MA), Sen. Obama (D-IL), and Sen. McCain (R-AZ). Notice all but one of the abstainers is a presidential candidate. And of all the candidates who did abstain, only one was a Republican. Not very good company you’re keeping there, Sen. McCain.

Gee, I wonder why they skipped on this vote. Surely they’re not trying to ride the fence. I know that anyone running for president would want to take a bold stand on the issues of the day. They must have had book signings or something more important than a silly old vote about the future of our country.

Meanwhile, I did see where Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), introduced H.R. 190, which would prohibit an individual who is not a U.S. citizen or national, for purposes of Social Security benefits, from being credited for income earned while he/she was not a citizen or national. Furthermore, it would require all totalization agreements to take that prohibition into account.

Furthermore, H. Res. 18, “Expressing disapproval by the House of Representatives of the totalization agreement between the United States and Mexico signed by the Commissioner of Social Security and the Director General of the Mexican Social Security Institute on June 29, 2004,” was introduced on 1/24/2007 by Rep. Virgil Goode, Jr. of VA. It was co-sponsored by candidates Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo, along with 45 other House co-sponsors.

Another problem in this whole immigrants collecting Social Security mess is that, according to a report by the John Birch Society quoting the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), “The Social Security Administration ‘permits foreign nationals to work many years illegally with one or more fraudulently obtained Social Security numbers, acquire legal status (e.g. through an amnesty or marriage to a U.S. citizen), obtain a valid SSN, and then request that his or her prior earnings credits be moved to the new number.’” There’s no telling how many millions, or billions, of dollars we are losing on that deal alone.

And, as the John Birch Society further reports, “Prior to 2004, before Congress banned the practice, illegals could return home and collect Social Security legally.” And since the 2004 law allows for a loophole for illegals from countries with which the United States has totalization agreements, totalization with Mexico would nullify the 2004 ban. What’s a country to do?

When it comes to other countries with whom we have Totalization Agreements, mostly European, their companies have workers which they send to work in the U.S. for a while and then return home. As far as Mexico is concerned, most of the immigrants coming from or through there are either illegally looking for work, or are looking to expand their illegal activity. The main “company sponsors” of the latter half are the likes of the Mexican Mafia, or MS-13. And I doubt that they contribute very much to our ailing Social Security system.

As time goes on, we shall see who stands where on “saving Social Security.”

 

 

Weather (Louisville) / MapquestWhite Pages / Business Search / CNN / Dictionary / E-card / MSN

 

Search WWWSearch www.jeffersonreview.com

To forward this article to a friend, go to your toolbar and click "file" > "send".