Jefferson Review

"Your Liberty is Our Interest"

Home /  Archives / Links / Quotes / Book Reviews / Advertise /Contact us / Subscribe / Calendar

Light Rail Debate

For those interested in the Houston rail debates, below is an op-ed in the Houston Chronicle challenging an elected county official's idea to bring commuter rail to Houston.

Below that are two letters reinforcing that opinion...one from yours truly.

Yours truly,

Barry Klein

——————————————————————————————————————

Nov. 5, 2005, 7:54PM  [print edition Nov 6, 2005]

OFF TRACK

Commuter rail is the wrong ride

It can't keep up with proven success of express buses

By TORY GATTIS

HARRIS County Commissioner Steve Radack has once again advocated for heavy commuter rail in Houston using existing freight rail tracks ("A WAY OUT / Ride rails to safety in disaster," Outlook, Oct. 23). This time, Radack noted commuter rail's potential usefulness in emergency evacuation situations.

The Metropolitan Transit Authority has preliminary plans for heavy commuter lines in the northwest corridor alongU.S. 290, the southwest corridor to Fort Bend County along U.S. 90-A, and the southeast corridor to Clear Lake and possibly beyond to Galveston, along I-45. Other corridors are under consideration, including I-45 North/Hardy Tollroad, Westpark and State Highway 288/Almeda.

I have heard support voiced all over the city for commuter rail on existing tracks. It seems like an easy, obvious, and relatively inexpensive solution to our traffic woes. But this is one situation where the citizens of Houston-area residents need a more complete understanding of what they will be getting and giving up before we proceeding down this path. Are we really, really sure this is what we want?

Heavy commuter rail has some appealing qualities. The cars are big and spacious, with comfortable seats and the ability room to walk around — maybe even buy food and drink on-board. They have dedicated right-of-way corridors with no traffic hassles. And of course they have tremendous capacity.

But I find that very few people in Houston understand how rail will fundamentally change their commute, particularly when it comes to door-to-door travel times. This is something Metro needs to be much more up-front about in its public information meetings.

Let's compare the typical HOV bus experience of today with the potential of commuter rail. Park & Ride lots can offer express bus service to multiple job centers, not just downtown (which has only 7 percent of area jobs). Express bus service offers incredible flexibility as jobs continue to disperse among multiple employment centers, a trend that is expected to accelerate according to the newest Houston-Galveston Area Council prediction models. They can jump in the high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane and zip past traffic at 60 mph, going nonstop point-to-point to their destinations. They can circulate when they arrive at their employment center, getting people close to their final destination building. In the future, this service will get even better as Metro expands the HOV/HOT network and converts much of it to two-way service.

Now let's look at the commuter rail trip. The first thing you notice is that it's not as fast as you thought. Because of stops every couple of miles, it's only able to achieve a net speed of 30 mph to 40mph. OK, so it's a little slower, but it's more comfortable — so maybe the trade-off is worth it.

Until you get to your end station. If you're unfortunate enough to live in Fort Bend County and commute downtown, you're now looking at waiting for a transfer to the 17-mph light rail line, then a full 30 more minutes slogging up Fannin and Main streets to get downtown. Similar transfers and slow travel times face anybody going to job centers other than downtown: Uptown/Galleria, the Texas Medical Center, Greenway Plaza and Westchase.

But let's say you're one of the lucky commuter-rail patrons headed downtown. Most likely your trip would end at the newly planned intermodal transit center just north of UH Downtown and the bayou. You're still a pretty long walk from almost all downtown buildings. Time for another transfer to light rail, and then probably a multiple-block walk from one of its downtown stops.

Checking your watch, you note that what used to be a reasonable 30-minute express bus trip has become a 50-plus-minute trek of transfers and walks, with sluggish trains that stop frequently. You might even begin to notice, during these transfers and walks, that Houston inconveniently gets a tad warm and rainy five-plus months of the year.

None of this is news to older transit-based cities. Lower Manhattan is struggling to build and fill office space.

Why? Because most of the commuter trains arrive at Penn or Grand Central stations in Midtown, and nobody wants to make the additional subway transfer and slog to downtown.

After doing this a while, the novelty wears off and you decide that, well, trains are neat and all, but "I'll just go back to my plain old HOV express bus service and the shorter commute."

Surprise! That bus service no longer exists. Metro has canceled it, and rightly so. The transit agency has sunk hundreds of millions of dollars in capital investment into the commuter-rail lines. Metro is obliged to absolutely maximize ridership to justify that expense, and that means canceling any express bus service that might remotely compete with the trains.

The painful new reality is sinking in, but there's no going back once the money is in the ground.

At the end of the day, if we opt for commuter rail, we will have spent billions of dollars rerouting freight trains and developing these lines, only to discover that our new transit service, while stylish, is now less convenient than before we started.

The result? There won't be loud riots or protests, just the quiet sound of people voting with their feet as more and more employers choose to locate in far suburbs because the commutes will have simply gotten too difficult for their employees — slowly draining Houston's commercial tax base and vitality.

Maybe it's time we get past our New York-envy and develop a flexible, regional commuter transit system for our dispersed, multinodal city of the 21st century.

Gattis writes the Houston Strategies blog. He can be e-mailed at tgattis@pdq.net.

————————————————————————————————————————————————————

HoustonChronicle.com -- http://www.HoustonChronicle.com | Section: Editorial

Nov. 8, 2005, 8:52PM [print edition Nov 9, 2005]

LETTERS

Tracking commuter rail

Copyright 2005 Houston Chronicle

Expensive, illogical

Tory Gattis' Nov. 6 Outlook article, "OFF TRACK / Commuter rail is the wrong ride / It can't keep up with proven success of express buses," was 110 percent correct: To build commuter rail only to use it for evacuation would be expensive and illogical.

In this area, we have had perhaps three major hurricanes in the past 25 years. So spending tax money on trains that first have to be justified for "normal use," before considering their use for the rare times they would be needed for evacuations, makes no sense. To evacuate people via commuter trains would involve having them leave their belongings behind, take their cars to the stations and then wait around while the train is loaded — plus, the train trip would take hours. And imagine the logistics problems at the receiving end! Remember, too, that the trains cannot operate in high winds and would be prone to flooding.

No, making simple changes to the roadways that will allow hundreds of emergency vehicles to be used for evacuations is the least expensive and most productive use of money. The well-planned use of city and school buses, numbering in the thousands, can do more good without any added costs.

DON GALLAGHER Houston

End of line on vision

Harris County Commissioner Steve Radack's simplistic argument for commuter rail was flawed. Former Houston Mayor Bob Lanier wrote an op-ed back in 1997 explaining how six Metro chairmen and four Houston mayors had studied the concept and found it wanting.

At the time Lanier wrote his article, the most recent study had determined that since commuter rail "is slower than the transitways, it would attract little or no business if lines ran parallel to the transitways." Lanier also pointed out that rail ridership, as reflected in national census data, "shows a trend line like a downhill ski slope."

The Metropolitan Transit Authority has put commuter rail into its long-range plan as a concept to be studied because the idea of using existing freight rail track for commuter rail has political appeal. But the proposal may well be dropped later, and Metro already knows why it should do so.

Hopefully, Radack's colleagues will take a close look at Metro's many reports on the topic if he tries to promote this vision any further.

BARRY KLEIN Houston

Weather (Louisville) / Mapquest /  White Pages / Business Search / CNN / Dictionary / E-card / MSN