Jefferson Review

"Your Liberty is Our Interest"

October 18, 2004

Home Archives / Links / Quotes / Book Reviews / Advertise /Contact us / Subscribe / Calendar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.N. Monitor:


New Details Emerge: France and Russia Bought and Paid for by Oil for Food

Freedom LineSince the first hints of the massive Oil for Food scandal, many have suspected that Saddam Hussein used the program to buy friends in France, Russia, and states that neighbor Iraq.

Over the past two weeks, three new disclosures comprehensively confirm that suspicion.

On October 5, a subcommittee of the House Government Reform Committee held hearings which featured first-time-in-public testimony from executives of key Oil for Food contractors. Their testimony confirmed that Saddam abused the Oil for Food program in order to pocket billions while the U.N. office in charge of the program ignored evidence of such problems as a result either incompetence or conspiracy.

To read more, click here.


Legal Update:


'The Antitrust Paradox' Continues

Freedom LineMore than a quarter century ago, Robert H. Bork noted the conflict between the pro-consumer policy behind the antitrust laws and the pro-competitor approach developed through their enforcement. In his seminal book The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself, Judge Bork, then a Yale law professor and later an influential federal appellate judge and Supreme Court nominee, argued, in the words of one reviewer, that antitrust enforcement had "led to the protection of inefficient competitors, the punishment of successful firms, and, ultimately, the detriment of the interest of consumers, which the antitrust laws were designed to protect in the first place."

Specifically, Judge Bork explained that the overzealous application of the antitrust laws and the resulting intervention into otherwise free markets did not maximize consumer welfare by ensuring lower prices, as is the purpose of antitrust policy. Instead, such an approach achieved the opposite effect by sacrificing potential consumer savings in order to level the playing field between admittedly unevenly matched competitors. In other words, the economic reality of antitrust enforcement is to prevent consumers from reaping the benefits of lower prices by punishing those large companies that are best able to produce products at lower costs because of their ability to employ efficient economies of scale in supplying their substantial market shares. Hence, the paradox: enforcement of the antitrust laws undermines their very purpose because legal intervention artificially elevates consumer prices by propping-up failing competitors in order to create the mirage of fair competition.

To read more, click here.


Legal Reform:


John Kerry vs. John Kerry on Legal Reform
His Record Reveals the Truth Behind His New Rhetoric: Kerry is a Consistent Opponent of Legal Reform


Legislative UpdateIn recent days, Democratic Presidential Candidate John Kerry has voiced his support for legal reform. But Kerry's record reveals the truth behind the rhetoric. Kerry is no supporter of legal reform. In fact, he has consistently opposed it in the U.S. Senate. There is little question that John Kerry has been and remains a good friend of the trial lawyers. Want proof? Kerry has received more than $12 million for his campaign from trial lawyers. And his running mate is renowned plaintiff's lawyer John Edwards. We've prepared a chart comparing what Kerry has said recently about legal reform with his record.

To see the chart, click here.


Freedom Line: Guest Commentary


Iwo Jima, If Covered By Media Today
By Senator Zell Miller

Freedom LineWhat if today's reporters had covered the Marines landing on Iwo Jima, a small island in the far away Pacific Ocean, in the same way they're covering the war in Iraq? Here's how it might have looked:

DAY 1

With the aid of satellite technology, Cutie Cudley interviews Marine Pfc. John Doe, who earlier came ashore with 30,000 other Marines.

Cutie: "John, we have been told by the administration that this island has great strategic importance because if you're successful, it could become a fueling stop for our bombers on the way to Japan. But, as you know, we can't be sure this is the truth. What do you think?"

Pfc. Doe: "Well, I've been pinned down by enemy fire almost ever since I got here and have had a couple of buddies killed right beside me. I'm a Marine and I go where they send me. One thing's for sure, they are putting up a fight not to give up this island."

To read more, click here.


Freedom Line:


Presidential Debates? Bah, Humbug, Squared!

Legislative UpdatePresidential debates, the new reality programming that have threatened even the primacy of the Trumpmeister and bikinied bimbettes scarfing worms, are not the way to select a President. You are being told otherwise, in the most reverential of terms, by everyone with a stake in the debate industry, undoubtedly the most lucrative seasonal work available, but don't believe them. We endured all three, four if you count the Veep dry-shaving Pretty Boy's legs with a rusty razor right there on TV.

Some debate critics argue that sophisticated government policy cannot be enunciated in two-minute bites. Sure it can. Taxes are bad. If you don't leave some children behind, no one will be left for unions to recruit. More people need guns than need health insurance. (Have you ever been to a health insurance show?) War is hell, but appeasement is national suicide. Big government is the answer to only one known question: What do liberals want?

See? Sophistication, nuance, some zen-think, the power of simple, irrefutable truth.

To read more, click here.


CFIF History & Civics Quiz:


Question of the Week
Freedom Line
How many families in American history have had both father and son elected President of the
United States?

(a) 1
(b) 2
(c) 3
(d) 4

For the correct answer, click here.


Jester's Courtroom: Tales Stranger Than Fiction
Featuring bizarre and sometimes humorous real life stories from the courtroom.


Partying All the Way to a Jury

Jester's CourtroomA New Jersey jury has awarded nearly a million dollars to a man who was discovered passed out on a snow bank the morning after leaving a New Year's Eve party. The jury ordered two local police departments to pay the man $850,000 because their searches failed to find him after a passerby reported a man unconscious in a 911 call hours earlier.

Frederick Puglisi, 20, left a New Year's Eve party to buy cigarettes and something to eat just after midnight on
January 1, 2001. Puglisi had been drinking, and, somewhere along the way, he apparently succumbed to drunkenness and passed out. According to Puglisi's attorney, a 911 caller reported that a man had been hit by a car at 1 a.m., allegedly referring to Puglisi, who doesn't recall any such accident. The police searched but never found Puglisi, and he remained unconscious on a snow bank until being discovered late the next morning. By that time, Puglisi's body temperature had dropped to 78 degrees and he suffered from frostbite that caused the disfigurement of his right hand.

Puglisi filed his lawsuit against the two local police departments alleging they inadequately followed up on the 911 report. Specifically, Puglisi's attorney argued that the police dispatcher did not get enough information from the 911 caller and that insufficient details were passed on to the searching police officers. The lawyer also claimed that the search was too short and that the officers never left their cars.

After trial, the jury ordered the
Bergen County police to pay Puglisi $450,000 and the Ramsey County police to pay him another $400,000. The jury initially awarded $1 million but reduced the verdict by $150,000, finding Puglisi was 15 percent at fault because he was drunk. The police departments plan to seek a new trial.

Source: Associated Press

To read more, click here.

Since many of these gems do not attain national attention, the Jester welcomes you to share with us your favorite wacky stories from a courtroom near you! Please be sure to provide the source. You may e-mail us at mailto:info@cfif.org


Notable Quotes:


Quote of the Week

Notable QuotesAuthor Burt Prelutsky, on Giving the United Nations Significant Power to Resolve International Crises:

"I would sooner trust the mafia to call the shots. You think I'm indulging in hyperbole? At least I have no reason to think that, for all its faults, the Costa Nostra hates
America. I mean, consider that among the regimes having votes are the like of Cuba, China, The Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea to you), Laos, Cambodia, Rwanda, Myanmar, Sudan, Uganda, and two-dozen Muslim-dominated dictatorships running the gamut from Bahrain to Yemen. And that's not even counting France."

For more Notable Quotes, click here.

Do you have a notable quote you'd like to share with the Center, e-mail it to mailto:info@cfif.org Be sure to provide us the source of the quote.


Ray's Cartoon Corner
:


Ray's Cartoon Corner

Freedom LineVisit "Ray's Cartoon Corner," the lighter side of CFIF's website. The Corner is a good place for freedom lovers and free market advocates to go to catch up on the latest social, economic and political issues affecting individual freedoms and rights through the humorous medium of editorial cartooning. The cartoons are drawn by Ray Gardner, a self described free market conservative and thirty-something cartoonist who lives and works in Phoenix, Arizona.

To view Ray's latest cartoons, click here.


As a non-profit, 501(c)(4) corporation, the Center for Individual Freedom relies upon the generous private financial support of individuals, associations, foundations and corporations. Please consider becoming a proud supporter of the Center today. To donate online, please click here.

 

 

Weather (Louisville) / MapquestWhite Pages / Business Search / CNN / Dictionary / E-card / MSN


Search WWWSearch www.jeffersonreview.com

To forward this article to a friend, go to your toolbar and click "file" > "send".