Jefferson Review

"Your Liberty is Our Interest"

October 11, 2004

Home Archives / Links / Quotes / Book Reviews / Advertise /Contact us / Subscribe / Calendar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THAT'S OUTRAGEOUS:

Property rights becoming an endangered species

Bluegrass Institute for Public Policy Solutions

From Washington State to Kentucky, property rights are under attack by radical environmentalists and politically connected developers.

King County, Wash is considering one of the most restrictive land-use laws in the nation. If approved, land owners would be required to set aside 65 percent of their property and keep it in a natural, vegetative state. Nothing could be built on this land and if a tree is cut down, it must be replanted…or else.

Rural property owners like Marshall Brenden would be most affected. Brenden told Fox News that the proposal amounts to “out and out stealing.”

The law expands its tentacles even further by limiting development to only 10 percent of property based on the questionable conclusions of government-paid scientists. Other scientists say the proposed rules ensure virtually no development can take place and that such a strict policy is not necessary to ensure a clean environment.

Environmental groups like the 1000 Friends of Washington sneer at those concerned about property rights as being “hysterical.”

It appears Newport, Kentucky’s city government has a similar low regard for the rights of property owners.

Seven property owners oppose the city of Newport’s attempt to acquire their land on behalf of a developer who wants to build a retail-office-residential development. Three of those owners appealed to the Kentucky Court of Appeals after Campbell Circuit Judge Leonard Kopowski ruled in June that the city could use eminent domain to get the properties.

Our Constitution and Bill of Rights protects property rights on the same level as it does with our other most cherished freedoms. Neither the radical agenda of out-of-touch environmentalists nor the land-grabbing tactics of misguided politicians should be allowed to pose such a potent threat against an important cornerstone of our liberty.

Sources:
“Major revisions to 14-year-old wetland rules sought” by Keith Ervin, The Seattle Times

“The 65-10 rule: a bad way to preserve rural land” by Toby Nixon, The Seattle Times

“65-10: the right balance for King County lands” by John Healy and Ross Freeman, The Seattle Times

“Private Property May Become Preserved,” Fox News

“Seven property owners still holding out” by Jeanne Houck, Kentucky Post

 

 

Weather (Louisville) / MapquestWhite Pages / Business Search / CNN / Dictionary / E-card / MSN


Search WWWSearch www.jeffersonreview.com

To forward this article to a friend, go to your toolbar and click "file" > "send".