|
|
FULFILLING SOCIAL SECURITY¹S PROMISE
by Rod D. Martin, 30 January 2004
In his State of the Union speech, President Bush courageously stood
four-square once again for Social Security reform.
As almost everyone now admits, the system will likely collapse long before
the last baby boomer retires. The doomsday clock starts ticking in 2014,
when its surplus evaporates.
Politicians speak of a Social Security "trust fund," as though your payroll
taxes fill an account with your name on it. But no such animal exists.
Were there one, why would there be any debate over whether your money will be
there when you retire?
Truth be told, your Social Security taxes support today's recipients. When
you retire, tomorrow's workers must support you.
But what if you're a baby boomer? There are too many of you, and not enough of
them. And boomers haven't reproduced like their parents. In 1950, there were
13 workers available for every Social Security recipient. Now there are but
three.
As former Democratic U.S. Senator Daniel P. Moynihan warned: "Unless we move
boldly and quickly, [Social Security's] promise to future retirees
cannot be met without....benefit cuts, tax increases, or massive borrowing."
Taxes have already skyrocketed. In 1937, the employee/employer rate was 2% on
the first $3000 of income. Today, it's 12.4% of the first $85,000 of
income.
Social Security faces extinction; and that's far from its only problem.
Social Security actually provides a negative return on your money once
inflation is factored in. And it pays a paltry $255 death benefit, barely
enough to buy a pine box. If the elderly face impoverishment, this is why.
It just gets worse and worse. You don't actually own or control your money
-- your life savings -- once it leaves your hands. Bureaucrats and
politicians do. They treat it like their own private piggy bank. They raid
the system's surplus and splurge on pork. They even tax your benefits when
you retire! What if you die first? They pocket the dough. Your heirs get
nothing, no matter how needy they are, no matter what you wish.
Clearly, the President is right. Social Security cries out for dramatic
reform.
That is why my Vanguard PAC, along with Jack Kemp, Grover Norquist's
Americans for Tax Reform and a host of other individuals and groups across
our nation, has endorsed a far-reaching privatization plan developed by
Peter Ferrera at the Institute for Policy Innovation.
Under our plan, workers gain back freedom of choice, ownership and control. They
can choose to remain within the old system, or they can save and invest 5
percentage points of their 12.4% payroll tax (and 10% of their first $10,000 of
income) in their own personal accounts, just like their current IRAs and
401(k)s. The plan provides today's recipients – irretrievably trapped in the
current system -- the same benefits they get today, while guaranteeing new
enrollees a minimum benefit equal to their share under the old system.
For workers who choose this new plan, the results could be spectacular.
How spectacular? One need only look to our sister countries who¹ve already
blazed this trail. In Chile -- where a similar plan has been in effect for
two decades -- 95 percent of eligible workers have chosen to participate in
private accounts, and the average Chilean today can expect to retire on more
money than the average American worker. In Britain, where more than 73
percent of eligible workers now invest their payroll taxes in private
securities, workers are averaging a 13 percent return (as opposed to between
1 percent and negative 1.5 percent in the U.S.). What's more, Britain's
pension pool -- worth over $1 trillion -- is now larger than the pension
funds of every other European nation combined.
The fact is, Americans put so much of their income into Social Security, and
do it for such a large percentage of their lives, that even assuming
extremely conservative returns and a relatively high rate of inflation,
studies show that our system would provide most Americans a retirement
income almost double their working-years salary. We could, in short,
virtually eliminate poverty among the elderly.
Even more basically, though, our plan would actually save Social Security
without cutting benefits or raising taxes. By triggering a massive shift
of workers -- and their retirement savings -- out of the old system and into
the new, privately-based one, it would transform not only our retirement
system but our economy. It would eliminate Social Security's $10.5
trillion unfunded liability, produce far higher returns, trigger a booming
stock market -- and overall economy and even provide the opportunity for
gigantic tax cuts.
But if we are ever to reform and save Social Security, now is the time.
Over the next few years, as the system's surplus grows, we will have a
window of opportunity. Our current Social Security surpluses can help
finance the transition costs. But time waits for no one. As the boomers
begin to retire en masse, the window will slam shut by 2014.
Congress must follow the President¹s lead and act now. The clock has almost run
out.
Copyright: Rod D. Martin, 30 January 2004.
-- Rod D. Martin, Founder and Chairman of Vanguard PAC
(http://www.theVanguard.org),
is an attorney and writer from
Little Rock, Arkansas. A former policy director to Arkansas Gov.
Mike Huckabee and Special Counsel to PayPal.com Founder Peter
Thiel, he is the Center for Cultural Leadership's Senior Fellow
in Public Policy and Political Affairs and a Vice President of
the National Federation of Republican Assemblies (NFRA).
=====================
To subscribe to "Vanguard of the Revolution", send the message
"Subscribe Vanguard", or the message "Unsubscribe Vanguard" to
unsubscribe, to
listadmin@VanguardPAC.org.
Contact
listowner@VanguardPAC.org if you have questions.
=====================
http://www.theVanguard.org
Vanguard@VanguardPAC.org
Vanguard PAC
P. O. Box 250038
Little Rock, AR 72225
The information contained herein may be disseminated for non-
commercial purposes as long as attribution (including our Web
address) is provided.
=====================
|
