



|
Hot Off the Press –
Balancing the Budget, Jazz, Zoning, and Hawpe in
Hot Water
By Theresa Fritz Camoriano
1. Budget - When
Kentucky voters elected Ernie Fletcher as Governor, they made it clear that they
want the state to rein in spending and not increase taxes. If the Republicans
have gotten the message, they may have a long tenure in power. If, instead, the
Republicans listen to The Courier-Journal and raise taxes, the voters may well
decide to clean house again in the next election.
2. Jazz - Fans
of jazz music are disappointed that Louisville’s public radio recently has
reduced its jazz programming, and, as a result, they are whining loudly.
Apparently, these jazz fans believe the taxpayers have an obligation to
subsidize their taste in music. But why? If jazz fans want to listen to jazz
music, they can sponsor their own programming on private radio stations, pay for
satellite radio, or buy some CD’s. Did the city of Louisville really give
public radio $300,000 of our taxes last year? That would fill quite a few
potholes! Taxes should be used only to provide services that cannot be provided
in the private sector -- radio certainly is not one of those services. As soon
as the tax funding of public radio ends, so will the whining.
3. Zoning -
Is the city of Paducah using zealous enforcement
of zoning laws to drive low income people out of their homes in order to attract
an upscale colony of artists? If so, it would not be surprising, as zoning
laws often are used to benefit people who are favored at the expense of those
who do not have political clout. In fact, the first zoning laws in the U.S.
were used to oppress the Irish immigrants in New York. If the upscale artists
want to buy homes in a neighborhood to create an artists’ colony, they could
offer their poorer neighbors a price for their homes that would enable them to
move elsewhere on a voluntary basis – but why should the artists bother
operating on a voluntary basis when they can rely on the zoning enforcers to
kick the low income folks out on the street, keeping the cost of the housing
low? Then, after systematically using zoning to kick the low income people out
of their homes, the zoning enforcers will decry the shortage of “affordable
housing”, will blame developers for the shortage, and will then force developers
to build “affordable housing” before they will grant approval for new
subdivisions, again forcibly shifting the cost of their decisions onto others.
How compassionate!
4.
Hawpe in Hot Water - The C-J’s
David Hawpe, a self-proclaimed worshiper of government as the solution to all of
life’s problems, has finally found a government regulation he doesn’t like!
Hawpe says he has taken the law into his own hands by physically removing the
flow restrictor from his shower head. Since there is no water shortage in
Louisville, and since he likes to take water-guzzling showers, he thinks it is
alright for him to ignore the government regulations designed to conserve
water. Of course, he is selfishly ignoring the fact that it takes energy to
pump all that water he is using, and energy to heat it, and that the use of
large quantities of water puts a strain on water mains and sewage treatment
plants.
When laws and regulations affect other people, Hawpe thinks they are great,
believing that other people should be forced to sacrifice for the good of
“society as a whole”, but in this case, when the regulations put a crimp in his
own style, he refuses to make the personal sacrifice for the good
of “society as a whole”. Actually, I agree with him. If hot water is what
floats his boat, I think he should be able to guzzle as much as he wants, as
long as he is willing to pay for it.
However, if Hawpe thinks he has the right to exercise his own judgment and
ignore the regulations against water guzzling shower heads, then, if he is a man
of integrity, he’ll have to accept the similar right of other people to make
their own individual judgments about how they want to live their lives, as long
as they are willing to pay their own way. They may decide that it’s alright for
them to drive gas guzzling cars, or to take control of funding their own
retirement rather than supporting Social Security, or to take control of their
children’s education rather than paying education taxes, or to spend the money
they earn on their own pet projects rather than having it forcibly taxed away to
finance Hawpe’s pet projects. Just imagine the possibilities!
|