



|
The Real
Thanksgiving Story
by Theresa Fritz
Camoriano
When I was a
child, I learned in school about the pilgrims, about the indians teaching them
to plant corn, and about the Thanksgiving celebration. We made turkeys out of
construction paper and dressed in the hats and collars of the pilgrims; we ate
turkey, corn, and cranberry sauce, but we never learned the real Thanksgiving
story. Only when I began home schooling my daughter and reading history from
original sources did I learn the real lessons from the Plymouth colony.
The pilgrims
entered into the Mayflower Compact, which established a form of
self-government. However, at first, this government created an arrangement that
resulted in poverty, starvation, and strife and nearly destroyed the entire
colony.
Instead of
securing private property rights, the government formed a type of commune, in
which the land and the crops were held in common for everyone -- the 1600's
version of Marx's "from each according to his ability, to each according to his
need."
This arrangement
was unsuccessful. People resented the fact that the fruits of their labor were
being given to someone else. They did not have the incentive to work hard and
to be creative and productive. As a result, the Governor became like an
overseer of slaves, pushing the people to produce, and threatening them with
punishment if they did not work hard enough. The result was discontent and
starvation. Many people died, and the survival of the entire colony was put at
risk. Here is what Governor Bradford, who governed the colony, wrote:
“For this
community (so far as it was) was found to breed much confusion and discontent
and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort.
For the young men, that were most able and fit for labor and service, did repine
that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and
children without any recompense. The strong, or man of parts, had no more in
division of victuals and clothes than he that was weak and not able to do a
quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and graver men to
be ranked and equalized in labors and victuals, clothes etc., with the meaner
and younger sort, thought it some indignity and disrespect unto them. And for
men's wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as dressing their meat,
washing their clothes, etc., they deemed it a kind of slavery, neither could
many husbands well brook it. Upon the point all being to have alike, and all to
do alike, they thought themselves in the like condition, and one as good as
another; and so, if it did not cut off those relations that God hath set amongst
men, yet it did at least much diminish and take off the mutual respects that
should be preserved amongst them.”
(It should be
noted that the Virginia colony encountered a similar problem.)
Governor Bradford
finally decided to secure private property rights, assigning a parcel of land to
each family and respecting the right of each family to keep what it produced.
This proved to be very successful. Again, from Governor Bradford's writings:
“So they began
to think how they might raise as much corn as they could, and obtain a better
crop than they had done, that they might not still thus languish in misery. At
length, after much debate of things, the Governor (with the advice of the
chiefest amongst them) gave way that they should set corn every man for his own
particular, and in that regard trust to themselves; in all other thing to go on
in the general way as before. And so assigned to every family a parcel of land,
according to the proportion of their number, for that end, only for present use
(but made no division for inheritance) and ranged all boys and youth under some
family. This had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious, so
as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the
Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave
far better content. The women now went willingly into the field, and took their
little ones with them to set corn; which before would allege weakness and
inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great tyranny and
oppression.”
So the American
colonists learned very early that socialism or communism was the path to
languishing "in misery", and capitalism or respect for private property was the
path to prosperity. Not only that, but people were happier. They learned that
even government force cannot make people productive. Only people who are free,
and who reap the fruits of their labor, have the incentive to push themselves to
work and produce to their full capacity. The capitalist system also preserved
"the mutual respects" among people so that, instead of quarrelling among
themselves, they were working industriously and were cooperating with each
other. From that point on, the colony prospered. Fortunately, the founders of
this country embraced private property rights and capitalism, fueling the
freedom and success that have made this country a great place to live.
Over the years,
this same experiment has been repeated and has continued to have the same
results -- from the capitalist successes in the U.S. and Hong Kong to the
communist failures in Russia, China, and Cuba. The communal system, which is
touted as being caring and compassionate, results in misery, poverty, and
strife, while the capitalist, private property system, which many characterize
as a system of greed, results in prosperity, cooperation, and good will.
Human nature has
not changed over the centuries. While small family units can succeed in a
shared, communal property arrangement, due to their mutual affection and
familial bonds, this arrangement cannot work for a large society, even for a
society as small as the Plymouth colony.
Too bad we still
haven't learned the lesson. Having a self-government, like our democracy or
like the government established by the Mayflower Compact, does not ensure that
the government will respect the people. Today, our politicians from both
parties accelerate the plunder of productive people to give to those who do not
produce -- seeking to buy votes and to repeat the failed Plymouth colony
experiment under such benign-sounding programs as “universal health care” and
“smart growth”. This Thanksgiving, as you gather around the dinner table with
your family and friends to give thanks, while you are sharing the turkey and
cranberry sauce, I hope you will also share the real Thanksgiving story. Maybe
this time we will finally learn.
|