|
Greg Holmes letter to C-J on Dan Seum
Dear Editor:
State Senator Dan
Seum, hero of the successful fight to get rid of vehicle emissions testing, has
a new bill to prohibit local governments in Kentucky from imposing smoking
bans. Your September 8 editorial, savaging Senator Seum for this courageous
piece of legislation, is a clever but misguided attempt to twist Libertarian
opposition to government controls into an endorsement of local tyranny.
Incomprehensible
though it may be to your editorial board, laws that promote individual freedom
are good; laws that restrict individual freedom are bad. What if a local
government tried to ban or regulate the content of the Courier-Journal?
In other words, the
mere fact that a noisy cabal of Lexington busybodies managed to enact a
politically correct superstition into law that bans smoking in private
businesses—even in bars and cigar stores, for Heaven’s sake—does not mean that a
local government in Kentucky should be permitted to oppress its citizens in that
way. After all, local governments are chartered under state law, and any
ordinance that exceeds local authority under state law is and should be void.
Government should be
carried out at the most local feasible level. However, this is a principle
designed to maximize individual freedom, not the power of government. We are
not the least bit interested in maximizing the power of local politicians to
impose their petty wills on business owners and other citizens who disagree with
them.
A good example is the
federal Constitution, which the Supreme Court has interpreted to mean that
states cannot establish tariffs to impede the flow of interstate commerce. By
your editorial’s logic, the State of Tennessee should be free to impose import
duties on goods shipped from Kentucky.
Individual freedom
works—not just for the press—but for everyone!
Sincerely,
Greg Holmes
Vice Chairman
Libertarian Party of Kentucky
|