



|
Evolving Law
By George Baumler
Not being a member of the
lawyer race, it is a little bit of a reach for me to write about law, but since
I am expected to live under these rules it is appropriate for me to discuss them
in a general sense. The Libertarian Party of Greater Louisville had a guest
speaker from a local "news" paper, who made the remark that campaign finance law
was an evolving thing; in such a tone you could tell he thought it a good idea,
too. Now, I don't know much, but evolving sounds like changing to me. The
campaign finance laws are as Byzantine as the rules for six-legged hopscotch
without throwing “evolving” into the equation.
Take, for example, the
term "coordination"; definitions are adopted and discarded as frequently as
politicians fabricate distortions of their accomplishments. One local rogue
office seeker was summoned to an FEC hearing for violating the proscription
against coordination, even though the courts had previously excluded the
definition, under which he was being investigated. The definition had
"evolved", which did not stop the FEC from investigating and causing financial
and emotional hardship to the rogue and "conspirators" for over nine years. The
definition of “coordination” is in flux even today; the meaning du jour does not
require that any communication take place at all in order for various people be
deemed to be “coordinating” their efforts. In fact, almost anyone at any time
could be found guilty of coordination in an election. But, the rules are
evolving and that could change; you already may be a winner.
Those who favor evolving
rules should get together with me and a few of my pals for a few hands of
evolving rules poker. I'm sure the reporter from the C-J who gleefully
supported the notion of evolving rules for purposes of campaign finance would
really enjoy the game of evolving rules poker. I could tell you the rules, but
hey, they're evolving.
|