|
Education's Edsel
(from Chuck Muth’s News and Views)
Sharon Wise is the Republican National
Committeewoman for Michigan who recently completed an eight-year stint on the
Michigan State Board of Education. She sent the following analysis regarding
the monopoly powers the government has over education. I think you'll agree
that Sharon Wise is WAY too wise for government work!
***QUOTE***
It occurred to me at as I looked at running for
the Board that parents want and need to provide five basic things for their
children: 1) they need to feed them, 2) they need to clothe them, 3) they need
to have a job or business to provide for them, 4) they need to put a roof over
their heads, and 5) they need to educate them.
Of these five areas the only one we allow to be
controlled by the state is education. And if the model we use to deliver
traditional public education services is a good model, I reasoned that we should
be able to use that same model for any of the other four areas. Hence, if we
decided to feed our children the way we educate them, then...
1.) All grocery stores/markets, as we know
them, would cease to exist and "Food Districts" would be formed with the same
boundaries as local School Districts.
2.) Everyone would be assigned to a public
store at which to shop based on the piece of property upon which they live--the
same way our children are assigned schools to attend.
3.) The public stores would be governed by
local "Food Boards" and elected the same way School Boards are elected. Their
responsibility would be to oversee the stocking of the shelves, store hours,
etc.
4.) Local control will be the mantra for the
Food Boards similarly to the mantra for School Boards, thereby allowing the Food
Boards to determine the appropriateness of food items such as chocolate which
reportedly causes hyperactivity, acne, etc.
It was obvious that if we employed this model to
feed our children, there would be a revolt in this country. Very likely an
armed revolt! People would never tolerate the intrusion of the government into
their lives in such a way. Which begged the question then and now: Why do we
have to accept the premise that the way we deliver public education services is
the best, let alone the only, way to do so?
|