|
How To Fix the
Senate
by Steve Moore - Club For
Growth
And now for the race that
so many of us have been waiting for.
Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania
has been one of the brightest stars in the United States Congress over the past
several years. Pat is precisely the kind of candidate the Club searches far and
wide to find: a man who is principled, is fearless in standing up to his own
leadership and has pit bull determination to promote our economic growth agenda
of tax cuts and smaller government. Pat (along with several others like Jeff
Flake, Mike Pence, Paul Ryan, and Ric Keller) has truly been the fiscal
conscience of the U.S. House of Representatives.
In the latest debate on the
budget, it was Pat Toomey who led the fight on the "Toomey Budget," which
contained even more tax cuts and budget reductions than the President
requested. That's typical Pat Toomey: always pushing the envelope for growth.
Although Pat Toomey has
represented Allentown, Pennsylvania, a very unionized steel town district that
leans Democratic, he has never compromised his pro-growth convictions. (He
really is a rare breed in our current political environment.) He has
consistently voted for tax cuts, leaner budgets, free trade, and personal Social
Security accounts even when those positions were politically explosive in his
home district. He was one of the few conscientious Republicans who voted
against the dreadful $400 billion pork-laden bill enacted earlier this year. He
promised to serve only three terms in the House, and he is keeping his word
(unlike some of the weasels who took a term limits pledge and broke their
promise).
Pat is now going to run for
the U.S. Senate against four term liberal Republican incumbent Arlen Specter.
This sets up a classic match up between a young pro-growth Republican challenger
against a veteran Republican with a poor voting record on our issues of
concern.
The Specter and Toomey
Record
You know how much trouble
we had this year stopping a handful of Republicans from watering down the Bush
tax cut. Well, two years ago, it was Arlen Specter who joined with the
Democrats in an attempt to gut the president's tax cut. He voted for an
amendment by ultra-liberal Democratic Senator Tom Harkin to slash President
Bush's tax cut by $450 billion. He voted for that tax cut trigger that would
have canceled any remaining tax cuts if Congress spent too much. He even voted
for an amendment by Senators Tom Daschle and John McCain to keep the top income
tax rate at 38.6%.
In the last Congress alone
Sen. Specter also voted:
1. Against school choice
in opposition to the President's position.
2. Against legal reform
efforts.
3. For the Senate version
of the budget-busting farm bill.
4. For an amendment to gut
the President's free-trade negotiating power.
5. Against an amendment by
Sen. Gregg to place meaningful spending caps in the budget.
Our records show that on
tax and budget issues, Specter has one of the worst records of any Republican in
the House or Senate. He voted for tax increases in 1982 (twice), 1984, 1987,
and even for the infamous 1990 "read my lips" Bush tax hike. He was one of only
two Republicans to vote against a 1997 tax cut.
Toomey earned the Taxpayer
Friend Award from National Taxpayers Union every year he has served in
Congress. Last year, the NTU gave Specter a 42% score.
In the last Congress,
Specter sponsored bills to add $29.3 billion in new spending, as if the already
bloated Federal budget wasn't big enough. Toomey's legislation would have cut
the budget.
Specter even has a higher
lifetime rating from the AFL-CIO than the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
I think you can see that
there is a crystal clear ideological distinction here between Pat Toomey and
Arlen Specter.
The Political Outlook
Needless to say, this is an
uphill climb for Pat Toomey. He is a decided underdog, though polling indicates
that he does have a chance to win this primary race, which would really make
history.
Arlen Specter will have
numerous built-in advantages. One is that he already has the entire Republican
establishment behind him.
Another is that Specter has
much wider name recognition from having served in the Senate for 23 years. And
perhaps his biggest advantage is financial. Specter has over $7 million in the
bank compared to $1 million for Toomey.
So here we find ourselves
in the familiar territory of backing a David versus a Goliath. We believe that
if Toomey can raise between $3 million and $4 million, he can make this a highly
competitive race.
Another View
I should tell you that this
race is complicated by the fact that some of our members believe that it is a
mistake for us to back Pat Toomey, because of the closeness of the Senate.
These Club members generally concede that Specter is a problem in the Senate,
but they believe that Toomey's challenge could put the Republican Senate
majority at risk.
We take this argument very
seriously, and concede that this primary challenge does pose some risk of losing
the seat ultimately to the Democrats. But we do not think this risk is very
high. We believe that whoever wins the primary between Specter and Toomey will
be the odds on favorite to win the seat against a Democrat, especially because
the Democrats have no strong candidates to run for this seat.
Specter's defenders also
point out that he helped save the nomination of Clarence Thomas for the Supreme
Court. But for many members, that heroic act is partially canceled out by the
fact that he helped torpedo the nomination of Judge Bork.
Your Decision
As with every race we get
involved in, but especially this one, we believe that given the controversy
surrounding it every member should make up his or her own mind about whether
they wish to contribute to Pat Toomey or not.
Here is why we are
recommending that you should give to Toomey. First, we think our co-chairman
Dick Gilder said it best: "When you see a rising stock, you buy it." Pat Toomey
is a rising stock, the future of the Republican Party. If he could be cloned
and we had 200 more of him in the House and Senate, our problems would be all
but over.
If he wins this race, it
would be an earth shattering political victory for good policy, for the future
of the Republican Party and for the Club for Growth. It would send a powerful
message to the Republican in Name Only ("RINO") Republicans that your time has
come and gone. Our other co-chairman Dusty Rhodes also put it well, when he
said: "If we are not going to get full blown behind the Pat Toomeys of the
world, why should the Club even exist?"
I would also note that the
Toomey challenge to Specter has already paid dividends for the Republican Party
and our economic growth agenda. Last week Specter voted for the Bush tax cut.
Specter is moving radically to the right for now, no doubt as a result of the
Toomey challenge. Unfortunately, after the election, he will almost certainly
move back to his natural comfort zone, which is to the left.
I hope you will join me in
making a generous contribution to the Pat Toomey for Senate campaign.
Your contribution will have
more impact if it's received by June 30, the deadline for the next candidate
reports to the Federal Election Commission. If Pat Toomey shows a surprisingly
large fundraising total, his campaign will be seen as gaining momentum and that
will make it easier for him to raise the money he needs to win.
Best,
Steve
__________________________________
Stephen Moore
President, Club for Growth
1776 K St NW Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006
202-955-5500
|