|
Two heads better than one?
By George Baumler
The old
adage, two heads are better than one, bears a little closer examination and less
faithful acceptance. The idea of twice the brainpower sounds great, but does it
work that way? Two horses can do more work than just one alone. That's a fact,
but the question should be: are two horses any smarter just because there are
two of them? Just because something is an old saying, doesn't necessarily make
it accurate. Many beliefs once held by the majority have later been found to be
inaccurate. The concept of Democracy is somewhat founded on the principle that
the majority is wiser than a single individual or the minority.
The
majority of people now believe the earth revolves around the sun and not the
other way around, but not too many centuries earlier the majority of people
believed the opposite. This clearly illustrates that the collective wisdom of
the majority was demonstrably less reliable than the minority who correctly
believed the earth rotated and orbited the sun. Just because an idea is in
vogue or is said to be cutting edge or has many adherents doesn't add anything
to its credibility. One example of fairly modern delusion held by many
enlightened U.S. citizens is the notion that the war against southern secession
was fought over the issue of slavery. The war against secession began April 12th
1861; Lincoln didn't free the southern slaves until January 12th
1863, over two and one half years later. Obviously if the war had been about
slavery Lincoln would have freed the slaves at the outset. Another widely held
delusion is the 1941 attack on the U.S. fleet at Pearl Harbor was a sneak
attack, even though it is an established fact that both the Japanese military
and diplomatic codes had been broken months prior to the attack.
Two
heads are obviously not wiser than one; in fact the majority represents only the
average wisdom or intelligence. Mental abilities are not like battery voltages
that can be added together in series to yield higher potentials. Mental powers
of individuals are more like daily temperatures that, like individuals, vary
greatly between extremes. Taken together, the yield is only the average. No
one I know of would consider it a compliment if it were said, "He has an average
IQ."
The fact
that the Majority wants this or that doesn't make it right or bright. The
founders of the United States understood that tyranny of an ignorant majority
was a real possibility, which is why they founded a constitutional republic and
not a democracy.
|