


|
Divine right or age of reason
(the recent shooting incident in
Louisville)
George Baumler
The
recent incident in which Louisville policemen shot a handcuffed man illustrates
why it is important to question the origin of government authority. Some
religious people argue that the power of government descends directly from
almighty God. This theory of government is also known as the divine right of
kings. The divine right of kings was the way of the world until the Age of
Enlightenment and still holds a powerful influence even today. The notion that
the infinite power and wisdom of God are somehow delegated to kings or
government officials is as ridiculous as it sounds. The divine right of kings
or elected governments to rule over us can easily lead to the conclusion that
the king/government can do no wrong, a notion easily dispelled by history.
In a free
society, the power of government is supposed to flow from the people to the
government, not vice versa. The rights of the people do not flow from the
constitution; they are merely guaranteed by that document; nor do rights flow
from the government, since the government obtains its authority from the
citizens. Logically, the power of government and its police forces are limited
to the powers legitimately possessed by individual citizens. In other words, if
it is unlawful for an ordinary citizen to shoot a handcuffed man brandishing a
knife, then it would follow that it would also be unlawful for any
representative of citizen-empowered authority to do so. If it would be unlawful
for a private citizen to storm a compound of religious fanatics, it would be
equally unlawful for any citizen-empowered arm of the government as well.
Individuals institute governments, armies and police forces in order to protect
themselves, giving those agents powers that were originally held by the
individuals. Therefore, these organizations cannot possess rights superior to
those of the individuals that created them. Exceeding individual rights is a
step backward toward the “divine right of kings” theory of government, or in
other words, a step toward tyranny.
|