


|
My Neighbor "Bill"
by Pat Pending
When I was a kid, we had a
neighbor across the street named "Bill". He was retired and a widower with no
children. Bill had many nieces and nephews living in town, but only one niece,
"Susan", ever came to spend time with him or help him.
Susan came regularly. She
helped Bill do his grocery shopping, took him to his doctor appointments, hired
a woman to clean his house, and generally tended to his needs as best she could.
When my father would go across
the street to visit with Bill, he always heard lots of complaints about
"Susan". Bill didn't appreciate what Susan did for him. Instead, he complained
that Susan didn't come often enough, or that she came too early or too late. He
complained that the cleaning lady Susan hired didn't always do a good job --
sometimes she missed some dust or failed to vacuum the spare bedroom. In the
end, Bill was so angry about Susan's imperfections that he called his lawyer and
changed his will to ensure that Susan would receive no inheritance from him.
Susan was unaware of Bill's action and continued helping Bill until he died.
When Bill died, the other
nieces and nephews, who had never helped Bill, and who had completely ignored
him for years, received an inheritance, and Susan received nothing. Susan was
hurt to realize that, not only did Bill not appreciate everything she had done
for him, but he had treated her much worse than the others, who had completely
ignored him.
It's a pity that Bill took
Susan's help for granted, didn't appreciate it, and, in fact, ended up biting
the hand that fed him by disinheriting her. It seems to be a quirk of our human
nature that we take for granted all the gifts that others give us, while griping
about their imperfections. If Susan had realized that Bill planned to punish
her, she might well have decided to stop helping Bill and to spend her time more
productively. You certainly couldn't fault her for making such a decision. But
Bill isn't the only one who bites the hand that feeds him. We do it every day
in our public policy decisions.
For example, we love it when
developers work hard, as Susan did, to build us our dream homes in the suburbs,
and we love the convenience of the shopping centers they build, but we take
these developers for granted as we gripe about sprawl, just as Bill griped about
Susan. So we vote for politicians who proceed to enact laws and regulations
that make future construction more difficult and expensive, biting the hand of
the developers. Later, we wonder why affordable housing is so difficult to
find. Of course, being like Bill, we then blame the "evil developers" for the
shortage of affordable housing and ask our elected officials to enact still more
regulations.
Similarly, drug companies work
very hard, as Susan did, to develop new medicines to help make our lives longer
and healthier. They invest huge amounts of money and take tremendous risks in
order to develop the few drugs that actually succeed. Then, we use the drugs,
just as Bill used Susan, taking it for granted that the drug companies will
continue to develop new drugs, while complaining that the drugs are too
expensive. If our elected officials take steps to curtail the property rights
of the drug companies in order to please us and reduce the price of the drugs,
they will be biting the hand that feeds us and making it much more difficult for
these companies to continue to develop new drugs in the future. Of course, we
will not know what cures and benefits will be prevented by this ignorant
behavior, but it will feel good to "get even" with those evil drug companies who
take so much of our money, just as Bill felt good when he "got even" with Susan
by cutting her out of his will.
Similarly, petroleum companies
work very hard to explore for oil, take great risks in drilling, then refine the
oil to make gasoline and distribute the gasoline all over the country. We take
it for granted that there will be gasoline at the gas station whenever we need
it, just as Bill took Susan for granted, but, of course, being our usual grumpy
selves, we complain that the price of the gasoline is too high. If our elected
officials listen to us and take steps to prevent the petroleum companies from
recovering their costs and earning a profit, they will be interfering with the
ability of the petroleum companies to meet our needs. Then, we may well find
there is no longer a ready supply at the gas station when we need it. (Remember
the long lines at the gas pumps in the 1970's?)
Of course, we could give one
example after another of destructive policies that are enacted due to our
failure to appreciate the benefits others have bestowed on us.
The fact is that we should not
take for granted the benefits we receive from others, and all we have to do in
order to receive them is to respect the property rights of others. Businesses
don't owe us anything. They knock themselves out serving us in the hope that,
if they serve us well, they will receive a profit. If they perceive that the
potential rewards are not worth the risks, then they will stop serving us or
will greatly reduce the benefits they offer us. We can't expect businesses to
be as selfless and trusting as Susan was.
Which brings us to the proposed
amendment #2 to the Kentucky constitution, which would remove some punitive
regulations that make it risky and difficult for businesses to serve us in
Kentucky. For example, the Kentucky Constitution now says that, if a company
owns land and does not use it for business purposes within five years, the state
will take that land away from the business. Would you buy land in the hope of
expanding your business under such risky circumstances? I certainly wouldn't!
Of course, we will never know how many businesses did not locate here and did
not offer us jobs, products, or services, due to such a punitive law. But, if
we are like Bill, we will be happy to "get even" with those mean old businesses,
won't care that we are biting the hand that feeds us, and won't realize how much
we are losing in the process.
|