


|
Courting the Creative
Class To Achieve Economic Development
By Theresa Camoriano
Greater Louisville Inc.
recently sponsored a presentation by Richard Florida, author of The Rise of
the Creative Class, who presented an interesting theory about how to promote
economic development in an area. His theory is that the places that have the
greatest economic success are those that are able to attract creative people.
He also says that a city’s lifestyle is what is important in attracting and
keeping the creative people, and that lifestyle can be promoted in low cost
ways, such as by word of mouth. He does not promote the usual huge projects
that drain tax money, such as arenas and convention centers. Bravo!
Now, this is a man who seems to
be on the right track! He is absolutely right that the greatest contribution to
economic development is made by the creative people among us – those who have
new solutions to problems, new ways of conducting business, new products, and so
forth. We all owe a great deal of gratitude to those people.
Since I have been a patent
attorney for over twenty years, I have had the privilege of working with many of
these creative people, and I would like to share with you what I have learned
from that experience in the hope that we can use that information not only to
attract creative people from other places but also to encourage and foster the
creativity of our own home grown people.
1. First, if we want
creative people to live and thrive in our community, we need to treat all
people with respect. We cannot take the adolescent approach of ridiculing
and ostracizing anyone who does not follow the average, normal path. Instead,
we need to respect and appreciate people who think for themselves and are
willing to forge their own path, because those are the creative people. If we
ridicule and ostracize those who might be considered to be “offbeat”, we
probably are chasing away the very people who could foster growth and
development in our community. From the perspective of government, that means
that the law should respect people’s freedom of contract and freedom of
association and should not single out any particular groups of people for
special benefits or punishments but rather should treat every person the same.
2. Second, we need to
appreciate successful business enterprises, recognizing that they benefit
their communities while they are benefiting themselves. Many people have an
almost visceral dislike for, jealousy of, or even hatred of successful
businesses, believing that the only way to achieve success in business is to
plunder other people. That is a very mistaken notion, and, as long as a large
portion of a community holds that view, the community will be hostile to the
creative people it needs in order to thrive. The reality is that businesses
thrive when they serve their customers well. Businesses also thrive when they
treat their employees fairly and encourage their employees to be successful.
So, a successful business enterprise means prosperity and success all the way
around – for customers and employees, as well as for the business owners. A
community that appreciates this truth is much more likely to establish an
environment in which creative people can thrive.
3. Third, if a
community wants to encourage the creative class, it should reduce taxes and
regulations to a minimum. Excessive regulations hamper a creative person
from being able to exercise his creativity, and a heavy tax burden punishes the
creative person’s success, both of which establish a very hostile environment
for creative people. For example, a creative person may have a great idea for
converting an old building to a new, productive use, but he may quickly give up
on his idea when he encounters the mammoth zoning regulations and building codes
with which he would have to comply. The result may be that the old building
stands idle or is used for a much lower-valued use than would have been possible
if creativity had not been hampered. Also, using tax money to subsidize
creative businesses is a big mistake, because it means that taxes will be higher
than they would otherwise be, thereby punishing success, and because subsidizing
a business distorts the realities of the marketplace.
Reducing regulations also means
that the community is free to develop the way consumers and creative
entrepreneurs want it to develop, frequently in ways the bureaucratic regulators
could never even have imagined. Heavy regulations, on the other hand, will lock
a community into a fixed mode, which frequently prevents the diversity in which
creative people thrive.
4. Fourth, a community
that is really interested in promoting the creative class should take a
serious look at its education system. Today, the largest portion of the
education system is under bureaucratic government control – not exactly a hotbed
of creativity! In government schools, students generally go through their years
as if on a conveyor belt, traveling at the speed of the “average” student, with
the most creative students falling off the belt and frequently being mistreated
because they don’t fit the “average” profile.
After over twenty years of
working with inventors, I would have to say that most of the inventors I know
were probably the hyperactive kids in the classroom, who were frequently being
reprimanded by their teachers and ridiculed by their classmates. Many got so
tired of the abuse or so bored by the lack of creative outlets in school that
they dropped out. One of my most successful inventor clients told me that his
high school counselor advised him not to go to college, because he was too dumb
to succeed. Another described how he dropped out of high school, went into the
Navy, and only later went on to study engineering. Another very successful
inventor said he was probably dyslexic, had a very tough time in school, and was
still working to overcome his lack of confidence caused by the rebukes and
reprimands he received from his teachers and parents.
Fortunately, those who became
successful inventors had enough self-confidence to continue driving forward to
achieve their goals despite the reprimands and tormenting from their teachers
and fellow students. But I can only imagine how many potentially creative
children were so beaten down by the system that they gave up on themselves.
A community that wants to foster creativity will stop locking children onto the
bureaucratic education conveyor belts and will stop beating down those children
who are “different”.
One of our daughters attended
the Academy for Individual Excellence, a
school that encourages children to learn in their own way.
However, it is a private school, not
available to children who are in the “education welfare system”. If
we want to encourage creativity, we should allow families to use their education
dollars freely in any way they think best serves their children. This
would enable a wide array of educational opportunities to spring up, which would
greatly benefit all children, especially those who do not fit the mold and who
may become the future "creative class" if given the opportunity.
5.
Finally, a community that
wants to encourage the creative class should focus on success, not failure. It
should recognize that many people fail on their first attempt but may succeed on
their second, or fifth, or tenth attempt, if they just learn from their mistakes
and don’t give up. Too often, when a person fails, he is labeled a
"loser". This doesn't encourage people to take the risks that
are necessary in order to make great progress. Too often, there is an assumption that many people in
society just can’t make it on their own. While there will always be a few who,
because of physical or mental limitations, cannot succeed without some help, the
focus should be on encouraging success, not failure. If we encourage people to
be productive and stop helping them to death, many of the people who were
thought to be helpless may turn out to be the very creative entrepreneurs who
make a big difference in their community!
|