


|
Air Pollution in
Louisville, Rule of Law in New Jersey
by Theresa Fritz Camoriano
Item #1 Air Pollution:
On Friday, The C-J published a front page story with the following headline:
“Jefferson tops air-pollution list for Southeast”, and included large photos of
a coal-fired electrical generating plant and of the back ends of automobiles.
Anyone who did not study the article carefully would come away with the idea
that Louisville has the dirtiest air in the Southeast, and this severe pollution
is caused by electrical generating plants and automobiles. However, upon closer
study, one would find that the ranking is not based on the air quality alone but
rather on some mysterious mix of air quality and the numbers and ages of the
people living in the area. So, for example, an area with cleaner air but more
elderly people would rank worse than an area with dirtier air but fewer elderly
people. Further, the data used for the ranking were 4-8 years old.
The photograph of the supposed
pollution rising from the generating plant shows steam, or hot water, which is
not a pollutant. And the automobiles are cleaner than ever, thanks to pollution
control equipment installed at the factory. Buried in the article is a
statement from Art Williams, saying that “Jefferson County rose to the top of
the list largely because of its industrial emissions and its relatively larger
number of younger and older residents.” Williams said that “diesel emissions
also were deemed significant, perhaps…because of heavy truck use on the county’s
three major interstates: 71, 64 and 65.” So, from Williams’ statement, we can
deduce that our ranking had as much or more to do with our population mix as
with the quality of our air, and, to the extent that traffic was involved, it
was primarily diesel truck traffic, not automobile traffic.
Despite its front page
placement and sensationalist headline, this article really tells us very little
of any use. It doesn’t tell us how our air quality ranks relative to other
cities or whether the air includes levels of pollutants that are likely to harm
our health. The bits of information it does provide are very misleading and
outdated. This use of pseudo-facts to confuse and mislead people can result in
very harmful public policies, so beware.
Item #2 Rule of Law in
New Jersey: Sen. Torricelli dropped out of the New
Jersey Senate race fewer than 51 days before the election. According to New
Jersey’s law, there cannot be a substitution of candidates that close to the
election. However, the plain meaning of the law didn’t prevent the New Jersey
Supreme Court from ruling unanimously that the Democrats could substitute Frank
Lautenberg as their candidate. What this means is that there is no separation
of powers and no rule of law in New Jersey. In other words, it doesn’t matter
what laws the people’s elected representatives pass, because the Supreme Court
will make its own laws as it sees fit in order to get the outcome it wants.
This is an extremely bad precedent. Regardless of whether the members of the
New Jersey Supreme Court like the law, it is their job to uphold the law as it
is plainly written. They have failed in upholding their responsibility, and the
people of New Jersey should be very concerned about this development. When
there is no rule of law, there is instead a rule by brute force. Even those who
are currently in power, including the members of the Supreme Court, should be
very frightened by such a development, which leaves everyone vulnerable to the
whims of a few powerful people.
|