|
To: Editor of C-J
From: Donna Walker Mancini
Chairman, Libertarian Party of Kentucky
Re: Campaign Finance Reform
As a woman who votes and as a former candidate, I feel I
must respond to the letter from the League of Women Voters about campaign
finance reform. Unfortunately, since the writer has not properly identified
the problem, she is promoting a solution that would only make matters worse.
We do not need welfare for politicians, in which taxpayers
are forced to subsidize political campaigns. I recommend the following two
steps to provide more competition in political campaigns:
First, we need ballot access reform that
greatly reduces the barriers to third party candidates. Currently, it is much
harder for a third party candidate to get on the ballot than for a candidate
from one of the two major parties.
Second, we need to get rid of the complex laws
that make candidates afraid to run for fear they will get into trouble just for
trying to participate in the political process. When I ran for Congress, I
kept my fundraising below $5,000 because of the paperwork that would have been
required and the fear of prosecution if I somehow made a mistake. As a result,
it was very difficult for me to run a viable campaign.
When people have more choices, they come out and vote in
greater numbers. We saw that in Jesse Ventura’s campaign for governor of
Minnesota, in which many people who had never voted before became involved in
the political process. Also, if the government would stick to the limited
functions authorized in the Constitution, it would not have so many favors to
sell to special interests, so we would have much less to worry about in terms of
corruption. As a Libertarian, I would like to see equal ballot access, more
choices for voters, and a government that is strictly limited in its scope.
|