|
The Limits of Courage
by Gordon Francis Corbett
Webster’s New Collegiate
Dictionary defines courage as, “mental or moral strength to venture, persevere,
and withstand danger, fear, or difficulty.”
Because we all want to prevent
harm, we all admire courage. Sometimes, we have it; sometimes, we lack it.
Physical courage lets us stand up to a bully or enter a burning house. Moral
courage lets us defend an unpopular cause or face people we have let down.
Nevertheless, courage is limited
by its nature. Courage is not cleanliness, reverence, honesty, industry, or any
of the other virtues, whose natures limit them.
War heroes exemplify courage.
Because we admire it, and because we imagine that it will let them discharge
their duties faithfully, we sometimes elect them to public office.
Unfortunately, we do not know
whether, or to what, they will be faithful. Their political philosophies will
determine that, and philosophy is a thing very different from courage. Courage
is simple and elemental; philosophy is an often abstract intellectual
construct.
Consider two men who served very
honorably in our Armed Forces, but whose philosophical differences produced very
different results in public office. Former prisoner of war Senator Jeremiah
Denton served Alabama, and our Constitution, well. Medal of Honor winner
Senator Robert Kerrey brought home the bacon for Nebraska, but he was no
Constitutionalist.
These men illustrate why we
should not vote for war heroes merely because they are war heroes. We should
vote for anyone only if that individual will serve our political goals. If he,
or she, served heroically in our Armed Forces, so much the better; but we must
never let the red badge of courage blind us to the bright light of philosophy.
|