|
Division and
Multiplication
By Gordon Francis Corbett
An
epistemological principle says that we learn about the world by distinguishing
one thing from another, or one quality from another, by learning their
respective characteristics. Thus, we come to know that a chair is not a dog,
and that heat is not cold.
The same
principle works in politics. Every political creed has its own
characteristics. Liberalism differs from conservatism, and both of them
disagree with libertarianism. Their definitions differ, as do their premises,
their purposes, and the set phrases of verbal shorthand that their adherents use
to communicate.
Nevertheless,
some political rhetoric repudiates this elementary thinking. During our
biannual election seasons, we frequently hear words like, “John Smith does not
believe in dividing us. He believes in bringing us together. Support Smith and
help to unify America.”
These phrases are
designed to create problems for Smith’s opponent, Jones. If Jones does not
believe in bringing us together, he must believe in dividing us, or at least, in
doing nothing to achieve unification. This is especially true if Jones offers
the voters a philosophy radically different from Smith’s. On the other hand,
Jones must offer the voters something different or surrender the race to Smith.
Today, the two
major parties really constitute one party, whose two branches agree
philosophically, but compete by offering the voters differences in rhetorical
style and in physical appearance.
That is where you
and I come in. We show the voters, in stark, clear, rational terms, that our
philosophy differs radically from our opponents,’ and why it beats theirs. When
those voters grasp the nature and the advantages of that difference, they will
see that we offer them what Barry Goldwater once called, “a choice, not an
echo.”
Only rational
division can let our ranks multiply.
|