Jefferson Review

Quotes   Links   To Advertise    Archives   

Contact us   Home   Extras

    Search this Site   Free Subscription   Book Reviews

 

(click on ads for more details)

In Association with Amazon.com

 

The Free State Project: An Introduction

by Jason P Sorens
jason.sorens@yale.edu
Department of Political Science
Yale University

How much is liberty worth to you?  Try to quantify it: what would you give up in order to secure real liberty, the kind we libertarians have imagined everyone would enjoy in an ideal society?  Would you move to another part of the U.S. if it meant you could enjoy that kind of liberty, and participate in building it?  If so, the Free State Project may well be for you.

 

The Free State Project (FSP) is a plan whereby 20,000 libertarians, classical liberals, and other advocates of strictly limited government will move to a single state of the U.S. to set up a free society.  We will do this by working within the electoral system, starting by eliminating unjust state and local laws and practices, like asset forfeiture, zoning, state drug and gun laws, socialized schooling, and so on.  We could also end state police cooperation with federal agencies in enforcing unjust federal laws.  Then we would bargain directly with the federal government over achieving sufficient autonomy in other areas; in Canada, for example, the provinces have won the right to opt out of different federal programs in exchange for a tax rebate.  We will continue to pursue decentralization until we have created an essentially free society.

 

The way it works is that the FSP will collect 20,000 signatures from people willing to move.  Once 5,000 participants have signed up, the whole membership will vote on the state to which we will move, following extensive research on the candidate states.  Our preliminary research indicates that 11 states are theoretically small enough for 20,000 activists to win most state-level elections: Wyoming, Alaska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Vermont, Delaware, Hawaii, Montana, Rhode Island, Idaho, and New Hampshire.  (For an analysis on how 20,000 activists could win majorities in small states, see the http://www.freestateproject.com/faq.html Free State Project FAQ.)  Don’t want to move to, say, Alaska or Wyoming?  No problem: when you sign the Statement of Intent, you may indicate which states you reserve the right not to move to.  The move only begins after 20,000 people have signed up.

 

What will make the FSP succeed where similar projects have failed is that: 1) we are researching the best place to go, rather than picking some arbitrary location; 2) we are relying on the decision of the membership, not one person’s fancy; 3) we are collecting signatures before the move.

 

The last is important because it means that there is no risk to signing up.  If we don’t reach 20,000 signers, the move never happens.  But if we do reach 20,000 participants, we will be on the brink of an achievement of historical significance.

 

What makes the Free State Project necessary is that libertarians have not achieved political success while dispersed around the country.  At the rate we’re going, it will take centuries to elect a libertarian President and Congress, if ever.  In fact, it is likely that if we do not strike a strong blow for liberty now, the chance will indeed be lost for centuries.  Right now the world’s political systems are on the cusp of rapid change.  But contrary to the “case for libertarian optimism” that was in vogue five to ten years ago, this change is mostly for the worse.  Globalization and the Internet have not caused governments to roll back taxes and regulations, as we’d hoped.  Instead, international organizations such as the IMF, European Union, OSCE, OECD, and United Nations have punished governments that allow financial privacy and pursue low taxes.  In the wake of the September 11th tragedy, the prospects for liberty are even dimmer: the catalogue of abuses coming out of the executive branch hardly needs to be repeated by now.

 

We need to undertake peaceful, legal strategies that give us a chance of winning.  At the moment, the Free State Project is our best chance.  The FSP isn’t a silver bullet, the one strategy that will put us over the top.  Think of it as a framework for strategies: imagine all the good that could come out of the sinergy of a single community of freedom lovers.  I can’t predict what will happen, but I can’t help but think that the results will be incredible.

 

To see if the FSP might be right for you, take a look at http://www.freestateproject.com – and let us know what you think!