Jefferson Review

Quotes   Links   To Advertise    Archives   

Contact us   Home   Extras

    Search this Site   Free Subscription   Book Reviews

 

(click on ads for more details)

In Association with Amazon.com

 

Hidden agendas of the war that is not a war

by Ed Lewis

 

If we are not free to question government, then we are not free.

Report after report is coming out which seem to verify US Government, or those in government, had prior knowledge to the attacks on the WTC. There is also considerable evidence linking the Bush/Cheney/CIA coalition to the desire of American oil interests to establish a pipeline across Afghanistan, enough that the matter should be intensely investigated. It seems as if every major player in the US Government, particularly those with past and current ties to the senior Bush – and by association or directly with the junior Bush – had an interest in creating other than Taliban control in Afghanistan and in establishing martial law within the many States.

And, yet, mainstream media in this country is essentially ignoring what the media in other countries and many researchers are finding conclusive. Why? Is it afraid to investigate the government? If so, why? Is it part of a conspiracy to defraud the American people into giving up rights that are associated with – and essentially define – Liberty? Since the possibility exists, then is there the possibility that media moguls are aiding and abetting an enemy or enemies of the American people?

We must first consider the power of the President of the United States. What authority does he have to commit military troops in foreign lands? According to the Constitution of the united States of America, he has none. Therefore, in committing troops to foreign actions, the President of the United States committed an act of treason. Furthermore, because it is only within the power of Congress to declare war, Congress likewise commits treason when it allows a president to commit troops to foreign lands.

If this isn’t enough for investigation and then full disclosure to the American people by the media, there is also the fact that a president may not even issue a Letter of Marque and Reprisal, or make rules concerning captures on land and water. This is also authority reserved only to Congress. A Letter of Marque is a document allowing a private citizen of one nation to seize individuals or goods of another nation and, about Reprisal, to use political or military force without resorting to actual war. Without a Letter of Marque or Reprisal issued by Congress, there is no authority for pursuit of any individual in another country.

Therefore, without a congressional declaration of war, or the granting of a Letter of Marque or Reprisal, the President is powerless. Thus, actions in Iraq (initiated by Bush the senior) and Afghanistan (Bush the junior)– to name a couple – are acts of treason against the Constitution for the united States of America and, hence, against the people of these many States.

One must always be suspect of what is printed or stated because of the control the “elite” in government exercises over all forms of communicating, including books, but especially that given out by mainstream media. The fact is that the media is going to spin whatever the government desires and ignore anything detrimental to those in government. This isn’t any secret and has been well known for generations. In fact, Mark Twain stated the dangers inherent in the media thusly:

“Do not fear the enemy, for your enemy can only take your life. It is far better that you fear the media, for they will steal your HONOR. That awful power, the public opinion of a nation, is created in America by a horde of ignorant, self-complacent simpletons …”

And, thanked by one of the people with the expressed intent of establishing a New World Order – a leading member of the Council on Foreign Relations – as treasonous a group as has ever existed:

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." - David Rockefeller, at a 1991 Bilderberger meeting. (My emphasis)

This statement is Rockefeller’s admission of the complicity of the media to satisfying the intent of those joined with the Rockefellers of the world intent on destroying the sovereignty of nations. It confirms the media has been committing treason against the sovereign people in that it has aided and abetted foreign powers, including the Federal Reserve owners, and other established or foreign involved organizations, including those of England, Germany, Israel, and within the District of Columbia. Such organizations include the United Nations (a corporation), the Council on Foreign Relations, the Illuminati, the International Monetary Fund, the Bilderberger Society, and many Zionist organizations, to name a few.

The media has further ignored ties of the Bush family, Cheney, and nearly all the Bush political appointees, to the CIA and its major drug dealing, major oil interests, other business entities it has huge investments in – including the Carlyle Group, Enron, and BioPort, to name a few.

Look, Folks, the list of ties of Bush to self-serving and special interest groups, including oil, pharmaceutical, and banking, with ties to Israeli and Jewish organizations, along with ties to extremist Islamics, could go on with enough documentation to fill a volume possibly more voluminous than USC 26, the Code that is responsible for stealing around 2 trillion dollars annually from the American people. This can be easily demonstrated with a few facts (taken from several different sources, including the companies listed) concerning the BioPort/Anthrax/Carlyle/Unocal/US Department of Defense/bin Laden family/Bush family/CIA ties.

Let us first consider BioPort Corporation, the only corporation in the States with a license to make the Anthrax vaccine. (This information is condensed in part from http://www.rense.com/general15

/mediarant.htm ) BioPort doesn’t make the vaccine but bought the lab that does, Michigan Biologic Products Institute, from the State of Michigan in 1998. This purchase occurred at the same time John J. Maresca, Vice President of International Relations, UNOCAL Corporation, was telling Congress that access to the oil reserves under the Caspian Sea required a new government in Afghanistan.

Admiral William J. Crowe Jr. who was on the Joints Chiefs of Staff when the elder Bush was setting up Osama bin Laden as a “freedom fighter”. It has been alleged that the joint chiefs were selling weapons grade anthrax to Suddam Hussein (yes, that one in Iraq who is supposedly an enemy of all people on Earth) during this time. The good admiral – now retired – is on the Board of Directors for BioPort Corporation and owns 13 percent of its stock.

The Carlyle Group, with an interest in the Afghanistan pipeline, owns stock in BioPort Corporation. Bush, the elder, helps run BioPort and owns stock in the Carlyle Group. And, not surprising after one studies government in any depth, so does the bin Laden family. It now seems the bin Laden family is planning on – or have – sold its interests. Whether that will cut them out of the tremendous profits is not known since it would be relatively easy to hide the profits through other means.

If this isn’t enough to stimulate curiosity, the sole customer for the Anthrax Vaccine is the US Department of Defense. Now, the stock owners of BioPort and the Carlyle stand to make tremendous profits even though the FDA has halted any distribution as the vaccine being produced is possibly contaminated. How so?

The FDA ban can be circumvented by emergency measures. Since the only customer is the Department of Defense, the ban will drive up the price on the Anthrax treatment and make investors in BioPort and Carlyle huge profits as the treatment now costs the US taxpayer $690 while Cipro (India) sells the treatment for $20 (at the time of the report). Sort of the same as when a toilet seat cost $4 downtown but the government paid its favorite supplier nearly $500 for exactly the same seat from exactly the same company.

Does the WTC event aid in any of this? The answer to that appears to be rather obvious. The event first enabled the government to create the illusion that bin Laden was responsible. This was needed to “justify” the attacks in Afghanistan intended on destroying the Taliban government in order that the pipeline deal could be resurrected providing an “acceptable” government was established in Afghanistan. Such tactics have been used in the past – or planned – to create sufficient public outcry for war. This includes Pearl Harbor (successful) and the military’s 1962 plan to carry out terroristic acts against American people, both offshore and within the states, in order to gain public support in attacking Cuba (not carried out). (Operation Northwoods was submitted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, March 13,1962, to Robert McNamara, Defense Secretary under President John Kennedy.)

Are you getting the picture? Unocal, the Carlyle Group and other US oil and energy interests want the pipeline across Afghanistan and have been working on it for several years. The Taliban governing the country would not allow it, nor would it have anything to do with the UN. Thus, the energy interests were blocked. This was the basis for the 1998 declaration of Maresca to Congress that a new government in Afghanistan would be required for the establishment of the pipeline.

At the same time, it is clear that the only organization that can distribute the Anthrax Vaccination is the Department of Defense and that the Department will purchase the vaccine through BioPort Corporation. Of course, the people alleged to have committed the WTC disaster are also those alleged to be using Anthrax as a weapon. Should this ploy fail, then the right wing radicals mentioned above – whoever they are – will be blamed. No names – just a general category stained by government/media generated negative connotations.

Add this to the Anthrax scare. Anthrax has been around for a very long time but few people have ever infected. In fact, before recent times, it wasn’t even considered a threat, not even as a biological weapon. The reasons for this are that only two countries can produce it in clean enough form as a weapon – the US and Russia – and it is extremely difficult to deliver as an effective biological weapon of mass destruction.

But, since the American people believe whatever mainstream media doles out, there has been a concerted effort by the government to scare the hell out of people in the States concerning anthrax. The Anthrax scare aids the government in creating the illusion of impending Anthrax doom. This is used to keep people fired up over ridding the world of terrorists by festering fear of mass biological caused deaths. This scare tactic drove the price of the vaccine up to its current level.

Furthermore, the Anthrax scare project has been used in conjunction with the WTC crashes to gain support for additional anti-terrorist measures (the same as anti-freedom measures). These additional measures will be used in firming up and expanding the anti-terrorist laws (based on unconstitutional federal policing actions) that were created following the 1993 bombing of the WTC and the 1995 bombing of the Murrah Building, measures that have quite likely been in the current form for the last decade, if not longer.

The scare additionally will aid the government in creating the fiction that “right wing militant” groups are responsible. In fact, the puppet media has already introduced this. This will allow extreme anti-terrorist actions to be taken against any citizen who dissents against government.

Another relationship of WTC to the Anthrax scare is that it is obvious the scare was planned before the event. This conclusion is based on the fact that Anthrax was gradually introduced to the people and that there had not been enough cases to speak of. Then, after the event, the media immediately became obsessed with it even though there still weren’t any cases.

Suddenly, as the public was made more aware of Anthrax, a few cases started showing up in the government controlled entity that every citizen is associated with – the US Post Office. And, then in government offices – not many or widespread – but just enough for the government/media to scream its fears of mass infections to the public. The powers that be had merely waited for the right opportunity to use the Anthrax scare tactic to force (voluntarily comply with) increased constitutional violations upon the people – and make it seem as if it was “for their own good.” The WTC event gave the excuse and a source to blame, the alleged perpetrator of the WTC attack. Just as William Randolph Hearst once said, “Truth is the first casualty of war.”

The media in this nation of free speech should be free to print or state the facts – that is, if they weren’t either too scared to or enjoying some financial or other perks for not doing so. Either way, whether voluntarily or coerced into doing so, the media is aiding and abetting in multiple unconstitutional activities, such as profiteering, extortion, conspiracy, misprision of felony (when they know the truth but fail to report felonies committed) and fraud of the American people. In other words, by helping the government to aid and abet enemies of the people of the States – including if the enemy is the government – they become part of the conspiracy to destroy freedom.

Anyway, here’s the point. There is more than ample verifiable information to justify pulling out of all foreign countries – including Afghanistan – until extensive investigations are completed by other than government investigators. The implications of the information emerging is that the US Government – or those in controlling positions – stand to profit greatly from the bogus “war against terrorism”. Among those who will profit are the president and vice president. If we get real for a change, no person can intelligently deny there is a serious conflict of interest between these two men and the security of the people of the many States, not only through oil interests but also the pharmaceutical industry.

We must not discount that every action thus far has been in violation of the Constitution for the united States of America and – whether any in government like it or not – the Constitution is the Constitution. Officials are elected to serve the people and are not free to ignore it or the rights of the people. They are not free to make law but only to observe law, the supreme law to obey being the Constitution itself. Any variance from constitutional law is an act of treason and they should be gleefully prosecuted for this, just as law enforcement, judges and prosecutors gleefully prosecute innocent people for crimes that do not and cannot exist in this Republic. As was said by President Franklin Pierce in his inaugural address:

“You have a right to expect your agents [and political leaders] in every department to regard strictly the limits imposed upon them by the Constitution of the United States.”

We not only have the right to expect officials to obey the Constitution; we also have the duty to force them to whenever cause arises. If cause has not now arisen, it is likely that recognition of the necessity will never occur. You see, the dominant change is our society has been the emergence of the constant commitment of treasons against the people of these united States of America by those in government. What has not changed – and what we must defend with our very lives if necessary – is the following Supreme Court decision that has never been overturned:

“The Constitution is a written instrument. As such, its meaning does not alter. That which it meant when it was adopted, it means now.” South Caroline v US, 199 U.S. 437, 448 (1905)

With all the violations against the Constitution that are occurring, Folks, don’t you really believe it is time that hidden agendas of those in government be uncovered with the treasons that accompany the agendas fully exposed, that the exposure must be followed by criminal charges being filed (members of Congress can be arrested when on the way home and when Congress is not in session) with immediate impeachment – or at least prevented from any governmental function until convicted.

Hmm. In fairness not shown to the American people in government-created courts of equity, one should add to the last statement above – “or acquitted.” This is with the provision that they can absolutely prove themselves innocent of liberty-robbing legislation directed against the sovereign, the people of these united States, just as we now have to prove our innocence in government’s unconstitutional courts.

If the time to reveal hidden agendas is not now – what would be a better time? Are we to wait until hundreds of millions are dead if current actions in other countries develop into World War III? Are we not at the crossroads leading either to liberty or to servitude to government? Are we once again going to ignore the warnings of our forefathers?

Alexander Hamilton in Federalist Paper #8 warned us of men with such contradicting programs as we are currently being exposed to:

"The continual alarm on a state of continual danger will compel the people most attached to liberty to resort for security to institutions which have a tendency to destroy their civil and political rights. To be more safe, they (the People) become willing to risk their freedoms."

 

(Editor's note:  While I am not inclined to buy into conspiracy theories, there is no question that respect for Constitutional limits is necessary in order to curb government excesses and to protect our freedom.)