|
(click on ads for more
details)
|
|
I Hate To Ask The Question, But
Does Dubya Stand For Wimp ?
by Randy Barker (8-20-01)
Granted, George W. Bush is light-years better than Al Gore would have been
in the job, and better than anyone the Democrats will field in 2004, but
there have been decisions during George W. Bush's first months in office
that make an actual conservative worried about what Dubya isn't going to
stand up for next.
Far from being the Far Right Wing ideologue Democrats like to label him,
Bush II is only slightly to the right of his moderate Country Club
Republican father. Even worse, George W. is showing signs of making
unprincipled Clintonian political decisions and exhibiting a liberal
disregard for solemn pledges, something made famous by his father. Bush
Senior's knuckling under to a deceitful Democrat Congress and reversing
his "Read My Lips, No New Taxes" pledge caused me to refuse to
vote for him. I expected that
George W.
would have learned something.
My dissatisfaction is not due to Dubya's recent decision on embryonic stem
cell research. That was acceptable. I view using stem cells from already
dead embryos like using organs from already dead adults. Something good
coming from a bad situation. But it wasn't a totally principled decision.
It rewards researchers for destroying embryos for research, something that
was illegal to be federally funded until Bill Clinton signed a
questionable executive order and circumvented federal law. Just another
land mine left for Bush by Slick Willy, similar to his last-minute arsenic
in drinking water edict. The problem with Bush's decision is that giving
an inch to people who don't worry
about ethics leads them to demand a mile.
It could very well be that embryonic stem cell research may not be
necessary. Advances are being made with adult stem cells and stem cells
from umbilical cords and placentas. We need to proceed with caution here.
Not so long ago, scientists were clamoring for federal money for fetal
tissue research like they are for stem cell research now. It was going to
allow wondrous advances. It has not lived up to the hype.
And who says the government has to fund everything? The lack of taxpayer
money doesn't doom cures for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease as some
are asserting. Stem cell researchers have big bucks and can exist
without our money. The mapping of the human genome was done by both the
governmental National Institutes of Health, and the private $1.7 billion
Celera Genomics Corporation (CRA). The private company completed the
project faster.
No, my disappointment with Bush is not about stem cells. It's about not
standing up for what's right. Not using the "bully pulpit". Not
fighting. Things like his Clintonesque desertion of female nominees. He
left Linda Chavez out on a limb and has not done a recess appointment of
Mary Gall as head of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, as he should
have, after she was unjustly rejected by Hillary Clinton and the
Democrats. He has let Ted Kennedy take over his Education Initiative and
eliminate vouchers. He hasn't rescued Klamath River farmers from
environmental nuttiness. I fear he will
sign liberal versions of the patient's bill of rights legislation, and a
watered down version of his energy bill. He caved on the Navy's practice
bombing of Vieques Island. He wants to give amnesty to illegal aliens. He
paid Red China $34,000 for housing our hostages on Hainan Island.
He's actually thinking about offering an alternative to the stupid Kyoto
Global Warming Treaty. And worst of all, he decided last Friday to support
racial set-asides for government contracts in the Adarand vs. Slater case
where the white-owned, low-bidder company lost a contract to a Hispanic
firm simply because of race. And he's having John Ashcroft send Ted Olson
to argue the
point before the Supreme Court! What worse betrayal of a campaign pledge
and basic principle could there be? To support "affirmative
action" and use actual racial bias to remedy alleged racial bias is
patently wrong, destructive to race relations and hopefully one day to be
finally ruled unconstitutional in all its forms. Equal opportunity does
not mean equal results. My favorite candidate in last year's presidential
primary, Alan Keyes, would not have made such an immoral, pandering,
political decision. Linda Chavez, the Hispanic president of the Center for
Equal Opportunity called it "horrendous policy". It's also a
futile gesture. The Hispanics and Blacks who Bush hopes to appease will
not vote for him regardless of what he does.
All this makes me very concerned. Where will Dubya wimp out next ?
Ronald Reagan has an aircraft carrier named for him. The way it's going
now, George W. Bush may have a national park in Kentucky renamed for him.
The national park now called Mammoth Cave.
Excerpt from NotSo SERIOUS MONEY,
a weekly online financial newsletter written by
randybarker@aol.com
|