|
(click on ads for more
details)
|
|
The
Tree of Liberty
When this country was relatively small,
consisting only of 13 colonies along the
eastern seaboard it was possible for freedom lovers to band together in
opposition to, among other indignities, taxation without representation.
Over a period of years resentment among the colonists grew toward a large
and remote government that limited freedom and imposed itself in and on
the lives of the people.
Eventually they had enough and they
revolted. And out of that revolution arose
the United States, a nation dedicated to
liberty and justice for all. For more than
100 years the ideals of liberty and justice
for all were taken to heart and were
enlarged and expanded.
At a bloody cost slavery was abolished.
Women won the right to vote. Laws were
passed insuring equality for all Americans. This was a good land.
But then in the early twentieth century the
idea became acceptable by many Americans that government is more important
than the individual, that government's purpose is not to make men free but
to guide them and direct them and to force upon them rules and
regulations that those elected to govern
insist are for their own good. And because the people took freedom for
granted they accepted laws and regulations and rules that limited their
rights and their liberties because, they were convinced, the security and
comfort each new law and regulation and rule brought were worth the loss
of a little
bit of freedom.
Thus it is that 225 years after the outbreak
of the American Revolution Americans are right back where they started,
with a big government that limits freedom and imposes itself in and on the
lives of the people. Only more so.
Perhaps it all began with the income tax,
that tax that in fact makes slaves of the
people, that takes money out of a worker's pocket before he ever sees it,
that puts him in prison if he refuses to pay it, that goes to buy votes
and in other ways to accrue power unto a select few, that gives the
national government nearly absolute power and authority over the 50
states, thus making a joke out of the proposition that this is a nation
made up of a group of states banded together for a common cause and a
common good.
Yes, it is true that in some respects
freedom has continued to grow, sexual
freedom, abortion, the right to express
one's self through vulgarity and sacrilege.
On the other hand most of today's laws and regulations widening freedom
for one group do so at the expense of others.
Racial preferences are a classic example. When special rights are granted
to one group for whatever reason they are granted at the expense of other
groups.
When religious symbols are banned in public places so as not to offend
atheists they limit others of the right to proclaim their beliefs. When
schools are forced to become co-educational they are deprived of the right
to educate those whom they would choose. When owners are banned from using
private lands because of the possible presence of so-called endangered
species government in effect abolishes the right to private property. When
government moves to
ban gun ownership it takes away a free man's right to protect himself and
his family and makes tyranny easier to establish.
When government tells a restaurant owner, a business owner or a building
owner that smoking is not allowed in his place of business it is limiting
that owner's freedom to decide to whom he will cater and how he will run
his business.
No one denies that government has some basic obligations such as providing
for the national defense, protecting the populace from crime and criminals
and passing laws that insure public safety and individual freedom.
But there is a line, and not a particularly
fine one between insuring public safety
without infringing on individual freedom and passing laws that put
government in the business of telling the individual what he can't do and
what he must do and what
government has a right to do and force
others to do.
These days that line is crossed more and
more frequently. Congress passes laws that grant government more authority
and take from the people more of their freedom. Bureaucrats write
regulations to implement those laws, regulations which often go beyond the
intent of the law. Federal agencies are given the right to fine and
imprison and confiscate without trial.
Daily government at all levels, but especially the national government,
encroaches on and limits those rights
supposedly guaranteed by the constitution.
Additionally, the movement grows and the
willingness grows to subject the rights of
Americans to international courts and
tribunals and treaties and commissions. And the will to oppose this
movement also grows-- weaker.
What is to be done if free men are to
preserve their freedom from encroaching
domestic government and efforts to impose world government on Americans,
efforts that are encouraged in some quarters of this land?
Jefferson said it best: "The tree of Liberty
needs to be watered from time to time with the blood of patriots and
tyrants."
We have not yet reached that point and we may never; we may instead
succumb to the rules and whims and dictates of an elite few whom we have
mistakenly chosen to govern us.
Nevertheless there is a movement afoot in the land that gives hope. While
advances in communications technology have mad the world smaller they have
also made the nation smaller and provided a way for freedom lovers to
identify one another and to warn each other of what government is doing to
limit and abolish the rights of free men,
aided and abetted by fools and others who place their trust in government.
I don't know what's going on on the left,
outside of what I read in the papers, but I
hear from some on the right and I know that there are persons on the right
who are alerting us as best they can to the on-going incursions of big
government into our lives.
No longer can government attack and
tyrannize in one area without it quickly
being known nation-wide. And as government continues to exercise
illigitimate power ooposition to it grows. We have seen roads closed by
the government in western lands reopened by irate citizens. In the Klamath
area where the government has shut off water
to farms we are seeing citizens take action to open the watergates.
We have seen bars and saloons permit smoking where it is banned by law.
We have seen the nation ignore 55-mile speed limits. We have seen parents
home schooling their children because the public education system has
failed them. We have seen a judge refuse to take down the Ten Commandments
from where they were posted in his
courtroom.
We have seen Randy Weaver at Ruby Ridge and the Branch Davidians at Waco
refuse to knuckle under to tyranical law enforcement agencies.
We have seen the growth of public law
foundations aimed at fighting overweening government in the courts. And
there is more, and all of this is good.
However, the fact is that today the forces
of freedom in this land are fighting a
sporadic and losing battle. And this leaves one final question. Will the
American people submit eventually and finally to the authority of Big
Brother and big nanny government that dictates their daily actions and
runs their daily lives or one day, while they still have their guns, will
they rise up as they did 225 years ago and begin again the fight for
liberty and justice for all?
It is to be hoped.
- Columnist and former Reagan adviser Lyn Nofziger, 7/23/01
# # #
***********************
To be removed, just hit "reply" with the
word "remove" in the subject line.
_______________________________
Powered by http://www.campaignoffice.com
|