Jefferson Review

Quotes   Links   To Advertise    Archives   

Contact us   Home   Extras

    Search this Site   Free Subscription   Book Reviews

 

(click on ads for more details)

In Association with Amazon.com

 

An Open Letter From Pennsylvania’s Commonwealth Foundation on taxation of internet transactions:

 

June 14, 2001

Rep. David J. Steil

Room 427 – South Office Building

Main Capitol

Harrisburg, PA 17120

 

Dear Rep. Steil: 

 

Your June 8, 2001 memorandum to the membership of the House of Representatives concerning The Commonwealth Foundation’s factual May 31, 2001 communication on House Bill 900 contains deliberate and outright falsehoods and I write to urge you to retract this memorandum immediately.

 

Allow me to detail the errors and omissions in your memorandum.

 

You assert that in our May 31 piece The Commonwealth Foundation said House Bill 900 “would force consumers to pay more for all purchases they make online or from catalogues.”  This is a deliberate distortion of what we said.  Here, verbatim, are the first two sentences of the memorandum from which you excerpted a quote:

 

 “A high-pressure push is on to add Pennsylvania to the list of states that agree to force consumers to pay more for all purchases they make online or from catalogues.   House Bill 900 is the first and essential step in this anti-taxpayer effort being orchestrated by national organizations such as the National Governors’ Association.”  (emphasis added).  

 

These sentences are wholly and completely accurate and for you to tell your colleagues otherwise is false.

 

You deliberately omit any discussion of a central goal of the Streamlined Sales Tax Project (SSTP), which House Bill 900 would affiliate Pennsylvania with.  The SSTP would allow states to collect sales taxes on all remote purchases, some of which are now not subject to sales taxes. (Our May 31 memorandum does deal with the question of the state Use Tax.)   The U.S. General Accounting Office notes that in its first year, the SSTP plan would cost Pennsylvania consumers as much as $375 million. 

 

Since you cannot challenge the accuracy of the econometric model that predicts that Pennsylvania will forfeit up to 94,000 jobs as a result of the implementation of the SSTP you disingenuously refer to it as a “strategy for obfuscation.”  Before they vote to affiliate Pennsylvania with the SSTP, your colleagues need to know what the potential economic effects of the expanded sales tax authority contained in the SSTP will be. 

 

Obviously, you did not bother to review the 47-page manual on this model that we provided to you at your request and in the interest of open dialogue.  The model measures the precise effect of using the sales tax to draw as much as an additional $375 million out of Pennsylvanians’ pockets and into the state Treasury in the first year.  This is precisely what the SSTP, that you are pushing Pennsylvania to join, would do.  This econometric model has been tested; it is accurate. 

 

You may not want your colleagues to face these facts – and facts they are – but we believe it is essential that the Legislature be fully informed before action is taken on legislation.

 

Finally, the false and misleading nature of your memorandum is underscored by the fact that you referenced me and this organization by name and did not give us the courtesy of receiving a copy.  Obviously, you knew that we would immediately point out the errors and omissions in it and therefore chose to not share it with us.  I would note, in contrast, that we have sent you copies of our correspondence on this matter and, further, we have hand-delivered additional materials to your office and to your committee staff. 

 

I find it ironic that you assert that our accurate memorandum of May 31 “drive[s] a spear through the heart of honesty and public discourse.”  That is precisely what your misleading and deliberately false memorandum does.

 

Members of the House can accept or reject the facts surrounding the Streamlined Sales Tax Project – facts that are at the core of concerns raised by us, Citizens Against Higher Taxes, Americans for Tax Reform and the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).  That is their right.  But to distort and misrepresent the views (and personally insult the integrity) of those of us who have honest and sincere disagreement with your position on the national sales tax plan is unfortunate and contemptible.  

 

Please retract this memorandum. 

 

Very truly yours,

Sean Duffy

President

 

C: All Legislators

    Gov. Tom Ridge