|
(click on ads for more
details)
|
|
APRIL *IS* THE CRUELEST MONTH
by Sheldon Richman
Taxes. Fiscal force. It's that time again.
This is the month you are ordered to reduce your financial life to a
series
of complex tax forms and get them in to the IRS (which, by the way, can't
keep its own records in order). The authorities are waiting to hear from
you. Don't be late. Don't fail to tell all. Don't err.
Not a pleasant subject. And why should it be? Taxation is legalized
robbery, compulsory tribute, exaction. The government does not ask your
consent, and as far as it is concerned, none is needed. It wants a healthy
portion of what you earned last year. You pay under penalty of
confiscation,
imprisonment, even death. (No exaggeration there. Try refusing the taxman
and then defending your property when the armed agents show up at your
door.)
The description of taxation as theft applies to any tax. Let's face it,
there is no sense in which you or I consented - without duress - to this
voracious monster we call the federal government.
The most egregious tax is the income tax. Any tax intended to raise nearly
two trillion dollars will be draconian, but an income tax is most
oppressive. For one thing, people will always be tempted to hide their
income. Nothing is more human than the wish to keep what one has earned.
But the government will go to
great lengths to prevent that. The complexity of the code gives government
great scope for intrusion. Each touted legislative effort to simplify the
tax somehow makes it more complicated. Everyone is a lawbreaker. The
taxman knows it and we know it. The system is based on terror, which is
unbecoming a theoretically free people. To rub salt in the wound, the
government compels employers to withhold the tax before we even get our
hands on it.
There is something especially repugnant about the government's demanding
that we report how much money we make and where it comes from. It is the
income tax that has made financial privacy an object of nostalgia. The
Founding Fathers would be appalled. They abhorred inquisitorial
government. Yet that is what the Sixteenth Amendment has delivered us to.
Today the federal government takes a record peacetime amount of the
people's income, more than 20 percent. The budget-makers brag about the
coming surpluses. But do they talk about dramatically cutting or repealing
taxes? Republicans use tax-cutting language ritualistically, but it
doesn't get much beyond that. President Bush's plan wouldn't even undo his
father's promise-breaking tax hike. Democrats have a pathological fear
that a tax cut would benefit the "rich" (who pay most of the
income tax) more than the "poor." Besides, they have too many
other things to do with your money than to let you keep it. They have to
"save" Social Security, pay down the national debt, increase
spending on education, build up the military, and a dozen other things.
None would be as beneficial to Americans or America as a repeal of the
income tax.
Truth be told, government does not serve the "general welfare."
It is just a
cynical transfer machine: politicians take what A produces and give it to
B.
The B's are well-organized interest groups, the A's the unorganized
majority. The system is designed to keep incumbents living in the manner
to which they have become accustomed. They buy votes by distributing
booty. (Don't be fooled by so-called campaign-finance reform.)
The only lasting remedy is a dismantling of the transfer machine we
benignly call the welfare state. The pillars of the welfare state, the
income tax and the Sixteenth Amendment that authorizes it, must go.
In all the public discussion of the income tax, the key fact gets lost:
It's
your money. You work for it. You earn it. It's your property. Only you
have
a right to it. You never freely agreed to surrender it.
We've come a long way since small tea and stamp taxes fueled revolutionary
thoughts in our forefathers.
Sheldon Richman is senior fellow at The Future of Freedom Foundation
(www.fff.org), author of the its book
Your Money or Your Life: Why We Must Abolish the Income Tax, and editor of
Ideas on Liberty magazine. Permission is granted to print, forward, copy,
and share this article, provided this credit is included.
***************
|