|
Louisville Police Have
Killed Another Black Man
Responses from the
Community Indicate Very Different Points of View
by Theresa
Fritz Camoriano
Louisville
Police shot and killed a man last week as he was using his vehicle to
crush a policeman. The
incident occurred as police were trying to find a suspect who had
assaulted a police officer a few days earlier.
The man who was killed was driving the suspect’s car but was
not the person police had been looking for.
News reports and talk radio call-in shows indicate that views of
the incident differ widely. Some
see this as part of a concerted effort to attack and victimize blacks
and say that the police should not have been trying to stop this man in
the first place. Others say
that the man who was killed had his fate in his own hands.
All he had to do was cooperate with the police, who were just
doing their jobs, and he would be fine.
How can people living in the same community read and hear the
same news reports and come away with such different impressions?
While we can
blame some of the “black as a victim” mentality on race baiters like
the Reverend Jesse Jackson and the Reverend Louis Coleman, who see
everything as proof of prejudice and hatred towards black people, we
must also recognize that there must be some difference in experience
between people in the West End and people in other parts of Louisville
that causes them to see the same news reports so differently.
Could it be that people in the West End of Louisville have been
living in a war zone and have found themselves and their community to be
caught in the crossfire in the war on drugs, in which many of their
friends and neighbors are hurt, and in which the police appear to be the
enemy, rather than the protectors of the peace?
The war on
drugs has had the same effect as alcohol prohibition, with gangsters
using violence to protect their turf, with innocent bystanders being
killed in gang-related drive-by shootings, and with police invading
private property, looking for contraband materials.
The police seem to be unable to stop the violence, but they do
regularly invade people’s homes and send people to prison for the
crime of engaging in mutually agreeable trade.
No wonder people in the West End feel abused by the police!
When the law
says that it is a crime for two people to engage in mutually agreeable
trade, where there is no victim to come forward and ask for the help of
the police, then police must become invaders in order to enforce the
law. Because there is no victim to come forward and cooperate with
police, the police must engage in no-knock raids of homes, in telephone
taps, and in other forms of snooping and invasion of people’s privacy
in order to enforce the law. Because
there are no victims to come forward and cooperate with the police, the
police also take extreme measures, such as confiscating entire
properties, including homes, vehicles, and farms, simply based on an
accusation that they were used in illegal trade in an attempt to enforce
the law. And the better job the police do of enforcing these
victimless crime laws, the more they drive up the price of the illegal
products, and the more the drug traders engage in violent behavior to
protect their profitable businesses.
So the innocent people in the community are harmed both by the
drug traders, who engage in the violence to protect their turf, and by
the police, who invade homes and confiscate property as part of the war.
It should
come as no surprise that people whose community has become a war zone
are not particularly fond of the soldiers conducting the war, even when
the soldiers are very well-intentioned and are doing their very best to
uphold the letter and the spirit of the law.
We cannot realistically expect to see an end to the anger, pain,
and suspicion until this war is over.
Perhaps it
is time for peace. Put the
drugs into the drug stores, allow consenting adults to engage in
mutually agreeable trade, and leave innocent people at peace in their
homes and communities. If
adults choose to harm their own bodies by taking drugs, it is a shame,
but they should have the right to harm themselves if they so choose.
We should not be willing to turn entire communities into war
zones just to try to protect people from themselves.
|