|
In previous
emails I have shown that Electrical Outlet Sealers provide a 10%
energy savings in buildings, residence and business. If you want
to see that email again you can go to http://www.cafrman.com/ElectricalOutletSealers.htm
.
Governor Gray
Davis of California is proposing spending $1 billion for energy
conservation measures, because this "..is the best and
quickest short-term solution to the state's crippling
supply-and-demand shortfall." However, the conservation
measures that are involved are all subject to tremendous pork
manipulation to favor certain people and again a large portion
of the $1 billion will be wasted in measures and programs that
will not benefit everyone equally. Each State legislator will
have his pork agenda.
The Governor has
also asked everyone to cut energy use by 8%. The Electrical
Outlet Sealers average energy savings is 10%. Here is what can
be done if the entire $1 billion was spent on putting Electrical
Outlet Sealers in residences and businesses:
| Governor's Proposal Cost |
$1,000,000,000 |
| Population (2000 Census) |
33,874,648 |
| Persons Per Household |
2.50 |
| Households |
13,549,859 |
| Sealers/Household (Average) |
80 |
| Price/Sealer (Allowing for inflation) |
$0.30 |
| (My sealers cost $.22 each) |
|
| Cost/Household |
$24.00 |
| Total Cost for Households |
$325,196,621 |
| Amount Available For Businesses |
$674,803,379 |
| Average Sealers/Business |
400 |
| Businesses Covered |
5,623,361 |
| |
|
| Total Sealers Required |
3.3 billion |
It appears that
this one item, with 10% savings immediately and long-term, will
do the job with $1 billion. The Governor's suggestions for the
$1 billion will require huge amounts of regulations, paperwork,
more employees, and a mountain of lawyers to sue on about
anything dealing with these issues. Also, some will take
considerable time to implement. Here are the Governor's
proposals:
a. Rebates for
energy-efficient refrigerators and other appliances;
b. low-interest loans for insulation and other weatherization
efforts;
c. Doubling the State's $50 million effort to provide money to
businesses that invest in equipment that allows them to
decrease consumption when demand is high and energy even more
expensive; and
d. Revising the State's appliance and building
energy-efficiency standards and providing cash incentives for
consumers who meet them.
WOW! Think of
the paperwork and time to implement such an extensive set of
rules. Probably one-third of the money will be spent in
creation and administration.
Electrical
Outlet Sealers - one item, one set of rules and the immediate
problem is delayed. Then the other measures proposed could be
looked at on a case-by-case basis when time and money permit.
However, a major problem is can the companies that make these
sealers make enough of them in a short period of time. If the
State of California negotiated with the companies, then the
crooks and most of the corruption could be taken out of the
equation.
What I do know
is that as California's economy declines, it will accelerate the
recession and cause a deeper recession for all of us. If you say
that California is not my problem because I do not live in
California, you have just told the world how stupid you are.
What happens in California does affect you. Did you know that
Governor Davis is now in Washington DC to ask for help? Guess
who will pay for this help? I'll bet you and I will have to help
California with their energy problem - U.S. taxpayers. You see
it does affect you.
What is really
ironic is that the California Treasurer Philip Angelides
"...proposed creation of a state power authority that would
float $10 billion in bonds to pay for construction of its own
power plants..."
Why do bonds
have to be floated? California, as shown in the 1999
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) had $67.94 billion
in potential surpluses of the taxpayers money it was not using.
That is $1,996 per person or $7,985 for a family of 4. If
California returned these surpluses to the people, this would
help the people pay their energy costs, alleviate the economic
slow down/recession, create jobs, provide increased government
revenues, and increase wages for everyone. You can see proof at http://www.cafrman.com/Articles/Art-CA-S1.htm
Don't allow your
Federal tax dollars to bail out Californians. They have enough
money to bail themselves out, but they still need to address the
energy problem.
You say if the
State of California has enough money to solve their money
problems, then why should I worry about their problems.
Californians do not know that the State government has $67.94
billion in potential surpluses. If the State continues to hold
these surpluses, then the State will go deeper into a recession
and the Federal government (your money) may bail them out. So
their problem becomes your problem, even if you live in Maine.
Another example.
During the last election Arizonians approved of a 12% sales tax
increase for some education programs. Arizona, at the
State-level, had $11.84 billion in potential surpluses. (http://www.cafrman.com/Articles/Art-AZ-S1.htm).
But Arizonians did and do not know that the State had/has these
huge potential surpluses. I am trying to get the word out, but
most people are not on the Internet; don't believe; and/or don't
care.
I do not know a
lot of people in California. I have notified those that I do
know.
Americans must
help Americans. Please hit the forward button and send this
email to those in California you know. You will be helping them
and yourself.
Respectfully,
-CAFRman
Lt. Colonel, USAF, Retired
This message is sent in
compliance of the email bill section 301, Per Section 301,
Paragraph (a)(2)(C) of S. 1618. I will comply with all removal
requests. Just put Remove in the subject line and email to:
cafrman@cafrman.com
|