Do you fall for the liberal dogma?

by Jeff “Mario” Smith, Guerilla Reporter, with thanks to Don H

February 27th in the year of our Lord 2010

It isn’t about “global cooling” or “global warming” or the latest dogma of the dedicated totalitarians, “global climate change”. It is about power and control. It is about totalitarianism where a select group of “educated” elitists live as they want, but tell the rest of us how we must live through laws, regulations, coercion, and in the end, the police state if they have to.

That science has been hijacked and turned into a political arm of the elitists is a travesty in and of itself. That people aren’t well read and engaged enough to relate this to other times in history when totalitarians stole the institutions of “higher learning” and turned them into propaganda machines is inexcusable. Everyone should read, or re-read “The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich“.

You can be a sheeple and swallow the dogma because “everyone is doing it”, or you can wise up, do your own research, real research - not google, and gain knowledge thereby learning truth. There is a truth and snopes and wikipedia are not truth’s allies. Contrary to the ever constant propaganda, everything is NOT relative.

As I watch the sheeple, that being the majority of the people who are happy to be entertained by Hellyweird, Sports, and the leftist media, while the world crumbles, I am reminded of the 1930′s and 40′s era Jews who just walked into the concentration camps, who just stood there at the top of the mass graves waiting to be shot in the head by some Lugar toting brownshirt, and actually ran there as told.

As God is my witness, I will live free or I will die, period! My Liberty comes from the Almighty, not from some gubament cheese bureaucrat doing what he is told so he has a “job”. No, our government governs via the consent of the governed, and it is my prayer that the governed rise up and say NO, WE AREN’T GOING TO TAKE IT ANYMORE.

Now is the time people. We either take back our country peaceably right now, or things get worse and the resulting anarchy destroys this nation and it crumbles into the New World Socialist Order. Remember the Latin phrase “Ordo ab Chao” [Order out of Chaos] and think about it. Then learn about the communist dialectic principle [thesis, antithesis, synthesis] and see if you cannot see it happening in our local, state, and national capitols.

If you don’t stand for something, you will fall for anything.

_________________________________________________________

Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2010 8:10 AM

Subject: Fw: Arctic temperatures dropping since 1979 (send to your progressive friends)

We have been told that the ice caps are still  melting and that is causing the colder temps in the rest of the world. So global warming is causing global cooling. A lot of people believe it.

But the article below, written by meteorologists, shows that arctic temperatures are ALSO falling. If temperature  affects ice caps, then how can the ice caps be melting with the arctic temperatures FALLING?

And if ice caps melt no matter what the temperature, then why fret over global warming?

Ah, yes, carbon off$et$.

Don H

“If one starts with the data of 1979, the year when many satellite data became available and many trend analyses start, then a significant negative trend of -1.36 K/decade is obtained.”

http://strat27.met.fu-berlin.de/products/cdrom/html/section2-3.html

2.3.1 Temperature Trends at the North Pole since 1956

The time series of the 30-hPa annual mean temperatures (°C) at the North Pole is shown in Fig.19. It is based on the data given in Table 4. If a linear trend is calculated for the whole series, the trend is -0.50 K/decade with a probability of 99%. But again, as discussed above, the interannual variability is large even in the annual mean and it is difficult to decide if this calculation is the correct answer to the question about temperature trend in the stratosphere. If one takes the first part of the time series, as indicated with the trend until 1979, there is no trend in the temperatures. If one starts with the data of 1979, the year when many satellite data became available and many trend analyses start, then a significant negative trend of -1.36 K/decade is obtained. As can be seen below this trend appears to be connected to changes in the winters/springs in the Arctic, see also discussions in Section 2.1. It is interesting to note that there are periods with a clear bi-annual signal and that the temperatures were relatively high in the beginning of the series, i.e. during the very strong solar maximum around 1958.

Figure 19: Time series of the 30-hPa annual mean temperatures at the North Pole, 1956-2000. Linear trends have been calculated for different periods. Data: Free University Berlin

2.3.2 Hemispheric Maps of Annual Trends at 30 hPa

Maps of the linear trend of the annual mean 30-hPa temperatures and heights are shown in Fig.20, for the two periods: 1965-2000 (top) and 1979-2000 (bottom). As pointed out above, many studies on trends start with the year 1979, because satellite data became more frequent then. Using the whole data set, 36 years, it is obvious that over most of the maps the temperature and height trends are negative and the statistical significance is mostly above the 95% confidence level, Fig.21. The structure of the trends is very regular, indicating an intensification of the zonal winds over middle and high latitudes (Fig.20, upper right map) and two regions of cooling: one in the arctic and a second, stronger one over the subtropics, around 30°N (Fig.20, upper left map). This agrees with the discussion of Fig.22.

During the shorter period, 22 years, the trends are generally larger but less organized, especially the trends of the heights, and single disturbed winters probably mask the general trend. One should therefore consider the shorter trends with caution. With this in mind, it is of interest to note that the double structure of the cooling is much more pronounced in the shorter, more recent period and that there is even an indication of warming over Siberia. This hints to an intensification of wave number one and of the Aleutian high which in turn could have a negative feedback on the polar vortex (a typical example of the AO).

Figure 20: Left: The linear trend of the annual mean 30-hPa temperatures (K/decade): top for the period 1965-2000, bottom for the period 1979-2000; right: the same for the geopotential heights (geopot. decameters/decade); (outer latitude is 10°N). Data: Free University Berlin

Figure 21: Probabilities for the maps in Fig.20

2.3.3 Height and Temperature Trends between 100 and 30 hPa, 1965 – 2000

Because the temperature analyses started only in summer of 1964 annual temperatures are available starting with 1965, exept for the North Pole. Therefore the following discussions concentrate on this period, also for the geopotential heights.

The negative temperature trend in the stratosphere peaked at 50 hPa at all latitudes, mainly in summer and early winter (cf. Section 2.2.2), and therefore in the annual mean, Fig.22, upper part, and the trend weakens upwards of 50 hPa. It is of interest to note that two regions with larger negative trends exist: the polar region and the subtropics, divided by a belt with weaker cooling. This hints to an interplay between radiative (in the polar region, likely connected to the ozone decrease in the arctic) and dynamical effects.

The trends in the geopotential heights (Fig.22, lower part) reflect the tropospheric warming in the tropics and subtropics with a positive trend in the heights from the equator to about 55°N, up to 50 hPa. With such a tropospheric warming the troposphere expands and the level of the tropopause rises, which in turn leads to a cooling above the tropopause at about 50 hPa; this may explain the observed cooling in the subtropical lower stratosphere.

Polewards the trend of the heights is negative, in hydrostatic balance with the temperature changes. The structure of the height trends indicates an intensification of the polar night jet in the annual mean, which is largely connected with the winter and spring, (Section 2.2.2). This intensified jet could be connected with a weaker transport of heat and momentum into the polar vortex thus leading to a cooling in the arctic, similar to the cooling connected with the ozone decrease.

Figure 22: Trends of the annual mean, zonally averaged temperatures (top) and geopotential heights (bottom) over the Northern Hemisphere between 100 and 30 hpa (16 to 24 km) for the period 1965-2000. (Labitzke and van Loon, 1994, updated). Data: Free University Berlin

---

[Section 2.4] [Section 3] [Section 2] [Introduction] [Documents] [Data] [Start]

Stratospheric Research Group

Last modified: Wed Sep 11 22:32:26 MST 2002